Home Blog Page 277

Greatest Cartridges: .44 Magnum a Silverscreen Sensation

0
Through the urging of handloaders and outdoor writers, among them Elmer Keith, the .44 Magnum became a factory load in 1956. Smith & Wesson also released the Model 29, chambered for the round, the same year.
Through the urging of handloaders and outdoor writers, among them Elmer Keith, the .44 Magnum became a factory load in 1956. Smith & Wesson also released the Model 29, chambered for the round, the same year.

The powerful .44 magnum cartridge, along with a new revolver to chamber it, the Smith & Wesson Model 29, were introduced to the shooting public in 1956. The shooting industry finally legitimized the big .44 after years of handloaders loading up the .44 Special cartridge to handle heavier bullets at increased velocities.

Elmer Keith was a member of the group clamoring for the factories to build on their experiences and to introduce the cartridge and handguns to handle it. Elmer was a well-known and respected outdoor writer and his sermon from that bully pulpit carried a bit more weight with the industry than did the average handloader.

Keith had loaded the .44 Special cartridge substantially heavier than the factory fodder available, for a long time, and proclaimed the improvements in the “improved” round long and loud. Industry finally heeded the message and the first two production S&W Model 29 revolvers went to Julian Hatcher of the American Rifleman and none other than Elmer Keith. Bill Ruger followed suit not long after and introduced a Ruger revolver later in 1956.

As Elmer told the story in his book Keith An Autobiography (Later reworked and republished as Hell, I Was There):

I wanted two things from Remington. I wanted them to factory-load my heavy .44 Special load, and I also wanted a 1-1/4-ounce Magnum 16-bore load that I’d been hand-loading successfully for years. There was no problem whatever on the 16-bore load. Petersen had called the boys all together, and they agreed on it right off the reel. But they were afraid of the old triple-lock Smith & Wesson .44 with my heavy loads. I told them I’d been shooting it for ten to fifteen years in the old gun I’d got from McGivern with no problems what-ever, fine accuracy, no undue pressure. However, they were skeptical of the old gun holding it. So I told them, “Why not make the case one-tenth inch longer and call it a .44 Magnum?” They agreed that would be a good idea.

In the end, Remington agreed to make the ammo, and S&W agreed to wrap a handgun around it, and the .44 Magnum was born.

The cartridge and new revolvers were popular enough after their introductions, but in a quirk of fate, the thing that really lit the flame of desire in many otherwise disinterested shooters was the release of the movie Dirty Harry in 1971 starring Clint Eastwood.

After detective Harry Callahan began singing the praises of the “most powerful handgun” on the screen as well as mowing down the criminal element with his S&W Model 29, the firearms literally flew off the dealers’ shelves. Within a short period of time, it was almost impossible to find a Model 29 anywhere, and in the rare event one could be found, the selling price was well north of the MSRP. The factory couldn’t keep up with the orders and I was told were actually rationing Model 29s to their distributor/dealer network.

In order to prevent a shooter from inadvertently stuffing a .44 Magnum round into one of the old revolvers chambered for the .44 Special cartridge, the Magnum case is a bit longer than the Special case, eliminating that potential disaster.

The .44 Magnum utilizes a case 1/10 of an inch longer than the .44 Special. Increasing the brass' length was meant to dissuade shooters from using the more potent round in the .44 Special.
The .44 Magnum utilizes a case 1/10 of an inch longer than the .44 Special. Increasing the brass’ length was meant to dissuade shooters from using the more potent round in the .44 Special.

The cartridge is factory loaded to between 1,300 and 1,500 fps depending on the load and bullet weight, and at pressures up to 36,000 psi. So loaded, it is a pretty fair hunting cartridge for a handgun, provided the shooter is experienced and can handle the recoil. It requires considerable practice to master. I was living in Alaska at the time of the height of its popularity, and .44 Magnum chambered revolvers were in great demand for carrying in bear country.

Although designed as a powerful revolver cartridge, it didn’t take long after its introduction for manufacturers to come out with handy rifles chambered for the cartridge. Ruger brought out the first one that I’m aware of, a handy little semi-auto rifle. Marlin followed with a lever action rifle not long after, and these days there are quite a few available from several manufacturers.

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it was not uncommon for a shooter to carry a sidearm and a handy rifle, both firing the same cartridge. Three such cartridges were the .32-20, .38-40, and 44-40. At one time, I owned a Winchester Model 73 and a Colt Single-Action, both chambered for the .44-40 cartridge. I wish I still had them.

Halloween Treat for You: The Best Gun E-Books and Downloads

1

Best Gun E-BooksEvery now and then, Gun Digest‘s official store, GunDigestStore.com, rolls out something above and beyond. This is one of those times.

The best gun e-books and downloads on the planet are on sale right now for 30% off. There’s no coupon code to enter, but the sale does end at 11:59 p.m. this Halloween (Oct. 31).

That means kids in costumes won’t be the only ones with a treat this Halloween. This deal is good on a pile of Gun Digest goodiessuch as:

Hop to it, and happy Halloween from Gun Digest.

P.S. What are you doing for Halloween? Leave a comment below.

Market Trends: Mid-20th Century Guns On Fire at Ohio Auction House

0

mt-shotgunJack LewisCowan’s Auctions, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio

Jack Lewis, resident firearms expert for Cowan’s Auctions, notes a real market shift in the collectibles market.

There is much less interest in those top-tier guns costing hundreds of thousands of dollars in the past year.

Demand for vintage firearms is still very strong, he stresses, but is now focused on items in the $1,000 to $50,000 range, and steadily pushing up prices within this category.

“Collectible firearms made between 1900 and 1980 are on fire,” says Lewis. “We had an LC Smith shotgun up for auction recently that, a few years ago, would’ve gone for somewhere between $6,000 and $9,000. It went for $28,000. Amazing!”

World War Two firearms are especially hot right now, including M1 Carbines, U.S. military sniper rifles, and any and all 1911 handguns.

On the European side of things, he notes that German bolt action rifles from 1900 to 1930 are moving especially well.

That’s increased interest in accessories for these rifles, too, including optics. For their May auction, Cowan’s will present a selection of German made, claw-mounted optics, for manufacturers that include Zeiss.

Editor’s Note: This brief originally appeared in the June 12, 2014 edition of Gun Digest the Magazine.


standard-catalog-2015

2015 Standard Catalog of Firearms, 25th Edition

You’ll appreciate this gun price guide if:

  • You want to upgrade your current edition of the Standard Catalog of Firearms
  • You collect, trade, buy, or sell firearms
  • You’re looking for accurate and up-to-date gun values

Shotgun Shell Crimp Styles and Performance

1
The crimp on a shotgun shell is easy to overlook, but this simple aspect of reloading holds a lot of sway over the ammunition's performance.
The crimp on a shotgun shell is easy to overlook, but this simple aspect of reloading holds a lot of sway over the ammunition’s performance.

No matter whether the hull is paper or plastic it needs to be positively crimped. And shotgun shell crimp styles play a number of roles in properly functioning ammunition.

One purpose of the crimp is to seal the end of the shell to prevent the shot from falling out and keep dirt from entering. The crimp also keeps the powder and shot properly packed for that micro-second when the primer ignites the powder and pressure begins to build.

The crimp is a patterned fold. Its design is essential for proper powder ignition and controlling the burn rate. Varying the depth of the crimp or otherwise changing a pre-established fold when you reload can quickly and surprisingly affect your shell’s pressure, so mind your crimp as you do the rest of your components and stick to the recommendations of the recipes you use.

A few years ago, two types of crimps were common, the roll crimp and the star fold.

The roll crimp dates from blackpowder days. Blackpowder was bulky, at least compared to today’s smokeless powders, so it needed all the room it could be afforded inside a shell. Everything was packed in tightly and a small over-shot card (also called a wad) topped off a roll-crimped load before the crimp was applied. The crimp, when applied, rolled the hull firmly back on itself and down to the card, thus holding the powder and shot firmly in place.

With the advent of more efficient smokeless powders, less hull length was needed to contain the powder, because less powder volume in a smokeless loading could accomplish the same or better results than did blackpowder. As a result, more hull was available for sealing the shell.

The over-shot card was dispensed with and the final quarter-inch of standardized paper or plastic shell was simply folded over toward the middle. Today’s final crimp depth is about 1/16-inch and has either a six- or eight-segment fold. Your shotshell press should accommodate crimp starts of either configuration, and you should use the right one depending on the number of folds your hull originally had.

Is there a difference between the six- and eight-segment folds? Except for the number of leaves or folds, no, but it is believed that the eight-segment fold holds a little tighter and is, therefore, a little better for the smaller shot sizes of No. 7½, 8, 8½, and 9 used in target and small-game loads.

There is a tendency for the six-fold to be used with larger shot in hunting and field loads. Also, the smaller shells in the 28-gauge and the .410-bore use a six-fold crimp, and though it seems counter-intuitive, the large shells of a 10-gauge also use a six-fold crimp.

Many experienced reloaders recommend that, when you work with a new (not previously crimped) hull, consider using a six-point fold starter rather than an eight-point, if you have a choice. The six-fold is easier to work into a fresh hull and usually realigns more easily.

Editor’s Note: This post is from the book Handbook of Reloading Basics.

Aimpoint Introduces Two New Red-Dot Optics

0
Aimpoint ACO red-dot optic is designed specifically with ARs and other carbines in mind.
Aimpoint ACO red-dot optic is designed specifically with ARs and other carbines in mind.

October has turned out to be a busy month for Aimpoint. This should be good new for red-dot optics fans.

The Swedish manufacturer was the first to market an electronic version of the sight. The company continues to be at the forefront of the optic’s innovation. And with the release of the past month, it appears ready to carry on its tradition of being at the cutting edge.

In Aimpoint’s most recent expansion of its catalog, the company has introduced two new red-dot optics that appear right on target. In one case, the company has introduced a new generation of a popular compact model. In the other, it has given AR shooters an optic tailored to their firearm.

The Micro T-2 Sight should presently be available and is the updated version of the Micro T-1. The optic does have a few superficial differences from its predecessor, but Aimpoint was quick to point out in its press release that the T-2 also has some new design tweaks that should enhance its performance:

The most important development in this new sight however, is enhanced optical performance. A newly designed front lens, incorporating an important breakthrough in reflective lens coatings, provides a noticeable increase in the clarity and performance properties of the Micro T-2.

Aimpoint's Micro T-2 is an updated version of an older red-dot optic, and comes with some intriguing improvements.
Aimpoint’s Micro T-2 is an updated version of an older red-dot optic, and comes with some intriguing improvements.

The 1x optic also incorporates a number of features advocated by users of the earlier generation. In particular, the accessory has a new sight housing that allows for the addition of flip covers and anti-reflective devices. And it boasts more rugged adjustment turrets and housing for internal electronic components.

Like the earlier generation of micro optic, the T-2 is designed to work with nearly any firearm – from pistol to shotgun to rifle. Aimpoint’s other new offering, however, is more specific in design.

As its name suggests, the Aimpoint Carbine Optic is engineered with tactical rifles in mind. At least from the high points listed on the company’s press release on the optic, it sounds to have some solid features:

The ACO pairs a 30mm aluminum alloy sight tube with an extremely rugged fixed height mount designed to provide absolute co-witness with AR-15 backup iron sights. A two minute of angle (2 MOA) red dot is utilized to allow maximum target acquisition speed and accuracy at all distances. The ACO is completely waterproof, and offers one year of constant-on use from a single 1/3N battery.

The other selling point Aimpoint boasts on the ACO is its price point. With a MSRP of $393, the optic is among the more affordable in the company’s catalog. The Micro T-2, on the other hand, has a steeper price tag with MSRP of $846.

Micro T-2 Specifications
Magnification: 1x
Red dot size in MOA: 2
Adjustment 1 click: 1/2″ at 100 yards.
Battery: One 3V Lithium battery, type CR2032
Battery life in hours: 50 000 (over 5 years of continuous use)
Material housing: Extruded high strength aluminum
Length: 2.7″
Weight (sight only): 3.4 ounces

ACO Specifications
Magnification: 1x
Red dot size in MOA: 2
Adjustment 1 click: 1/2″ at 100 yards
Battery: One 3V Lithium battery, type 2L76 or DL1/3N
Battery life in hours: 10,000 (over 1 year of continuous use)
Material housing: Extruded high strength aluminum
Length: 5.1″
Weight sight only: 7.8 ounces


customizing-AR

Gun Digest Guide to Customizing Your AR-15

 

Gamo Releases Updated Version of Varmint Hunter Air Rifle

0
Gamo has reintroduced its storied Varmint Hunter air rifle, decked out with some new top-notch features.
Gamo has reintroduced its storied Varmint Hunter air rifle, decked out with some new top-notch features.

Gamo has reintroduced one of its most popular air rifles, offering the Varmint Hunter with a number of top-line features.

Literally and metaphorically, air guns tend to be a quiet corner of the gun world. But if you listen carefully, there is always noise being made in this gun niche.

One of the most recent ruckuses was created by Gamo, who recently released a new take on one of its classics. The Spanish manufacturer has updated its Varmint Hunter with a number of top-line features, which look to add plenty of value to the popular air rifle.

Perhaps the two most notable upgrades to the .177 caliber rifle is Gamo’s addition of its proprietary Smooth Action Trigger and Shock Wave Absorber.

The SAT is a two-stage trigger noted for its short first stage. The trigger has an adjustable second stage, though the pull-weight range was not available on the company’s website.

The SWA is a recoil-reduction pad on the buttstock, which has adjustable configuration. For the most part, most shooters most likely wouldn’t notice the 74-percent recoil reduction Gamo promises from the pad. But those looking to use the rifle for precision target shooting have the potential of being appreciative of the addition.

The break-barrel air gun has continued to be outfitted with one of its more popular features. The rifle is ready to hit the field out of the box adorned with a slick sights and lights package.

The rifle comes with Gamo’s 4×32 Varmint Hunter Kit II scope pre-installed. The optic has a flashlight/laser combo mounted on top, which has a handy pressure-pad control.

The optics aren’t just for show, given the Varmint Hunter produces velocities that helps the rifle live up to its name. The air gun pushes, at the muzzle, Gamo’s premium PBA Platinum pellets 1,250 fps and regular lead pellets 1,000 fps – plenty of oomph to knock a squirrel on his brushy tail.

The Varmint Hunter has an all-synthetic stock and boasts a polymer jacket over its steel barrel. These features keep the gun a manageable 7.15 pounds.

The rifle measures in at 43-inches, boasting an 18-inch barrel. The length of the gun not only aids accuracy, it also helps make the 30-pounds cocking effort easier to tackle.

Gamo has an MSRP of $249.95 on the Varmint Hunter, making it an affordable option in high-powered air rifles.

Market Trends: Court Rulings Helping Western Concealed Carry Market

0

concealed carryKris W. JacobBullseye USA, Inc., Stores in California and Nevada

With stores in Castro Valley and San Rafael, Calif., Bullseye USA is seeing a surge in small handgun sales. Why?

Explains Bullseye President Kris Jacob, “While demand for full-size handguns in self-defense calibers is still strong, concealed carry has been getting a great deal of press in California and Nevada as a result of two 9th Circuit Court decisions challenging local law enforcement’s ‘may issue,’ policies on constitutional grounds.”

California handgun options are restricted to that state’s “approved list,” but within that parameter, smaller models by Kahr, Ruger and Sig Sauer are doing well.

At the Gardnerville, Nev., store, the Glock 42 is a big seller, at $480.

“When we can get them in!” Jacob added.

Handguns haven’t been the only thing moving for Bullseye.

“We’ve been having great success with Off The Grid MKi Appendix Carry Holsters, as well as the Haley Strategic/G-Code INCOG Holsters,” Jacob notes. “These holsters offer deep concealment and comfort in one package.”

Editor’s Note: This brief originally appeared in the May 15, 2014 edition of Gun Digest the Magazine.


Defend Yourself by Rob PIncus

Defend Yourself: A Comprehensive Security Plan for the Armed Homeowner

Defend Yourself: A Comprehensive Security Plan for the Armed Homeowner by Rob Pincus is the most complete and practical guide to home defense available today. Drawing from experience helping law enforcement, military, private security and people just like you understand how to protect themselves or others, Rob Pincus presents detailed information about planning for, training for and, ultimately, defending yourself and your family from a violent predator inside your home.

Handgun Review: .380 Carry Pistols

5

The sometimes-maligned .380 is still a favorite carry choice. Here we test three of the more popular .380 carry pistols side-by-side.

The three test pistols, (top to bottom): Glock 42, Smith & Wesson Bodyguard, and Ruger LCP.
The three test pistols, (top to bottom): Glock 42, Smith & Wesson Bodyguard, and Ruger LCP.

One of the hottest choices of concealed carry guns for the small gun/comfortable group is the semi-auto .380s. They’re very light and extremely slim, and you can carry one anywhere without the slightest discomfort. There are a lot of models, and getting all of them together for a test was a daunting task.

I don’t like daunting tasks, so I chose the three I thought best represented the cream of the crop. They certainly represent the most popular, one being new this year, but having a strong brand following, the other two having strong sales records.

The new gun on the block is the Glock 42. The new .380 may be a single-stack .380, but it’s Glock through and through. The 42 has the same Glock trigger, the standard easy-to-see Glock sights and the same styling and controls of its bigger brothers.

It’s a little bigger than most .380 semi-autos, falling between the average .380 and the smaller 9s like the S&W Shield. While guns like the PPK are larger, I guess you could say it’s the largest of the subcompact .380s.

The second gun in the test is the iconic Ruger LCP. These little guns have probably been as close to the cause of the shortage in .380 ammunition as any other models. The LCP is the smallest of the three and also the simplest.

The Ruger design is double action but doesn’t have re-strike capability. The trigger pull doesn’t completely cock the hammer, meaning a dud round requires a cycle of the slide like the striker-fired Glock. Another distinguishing feature is the lack of slide lock on the last round in the magazine.

The slide won’t lock to the rear on the last shot, but you can lock the slide back manually for safety and cleaning. Clearing a malfunction on a tiny .380 can be a trying and potentially dangerous experience without the slide locked back. For sighting, the Ruger has a small milled bump for a front sight and a milled groove in the rear.

The third gun is the S&W Bodyguard, a subcompact with full double-action-only operation, a slide lock and a built-in laser. The laser switch is activated with buttons on either side of the frame forward of the trigger guard. Slightly larger and heavier than the Ruger, the Bodyguard also has a thumb safety and uses a Baughman Quick Draw ramped front sight and a ramped rear sight. Both front and rear sights are dovetailed into the slide.

All the guns use polymer frames and steel slides. All three also have 6 + 1 capacity, and shoot the .380 or 9mm Kurtz round. All three guns represent what their manufacturers believe to be the best way to build a subcompact .380. All have advantages.

The Ruger is the smallest and lightest at less than 10 ounces, but the slide doesn’t lock back on the last round and it has tiny sights. The Glock is the easiest to shoot because of its size, has the best sights and the benefit of the same trigger as larger Glock models. The Bodyguard has double-action re-strike capability, a manual safety and a laser as standard equipment.

Accuracy at 7 yards was good enough to keep everything in the A zone of an IDPA target, even when shooting fast. Author Photo
Accuracy at 7 yards was good enough to keep everything in the A zone of an IDPA target, even when shooting fast. Author Photo

Shooting Impressions

The Ruger LCP is certainly the smallest of the three guns. It’s also the lightest, but it has the least features. While an extended 380-Carry-Pistols-Test-3gunfight with a .380 seems unlikely, a slide that locks back on the last round is a valuable feature. At least there’s a manual slide lock. Naturally its lightweight property and small size resulted in the most recoil, and though it didn’t feel out of control, I suspect follow-up shots were slower.

The LCP also had the longest trigger stroke and the shortest distance from the web of my hand to the trigger. I suspect this made the trigger feel less manageable, but a shooter with a smaller hand might not notice. The sights are tiny, but I shot a smaller group with the LCP than with the Glock. There were no malfunctions, and even when I held it loosely in one hand, I couldn’t make it not function.

I did notice one issue on the Ruger that might create problems for shooters with poor hand strength. In teaching concealed carry, I have a lot of new shooters and many are older women. Most of those women have trouble cycling the slide on most semi-autos.

I had a few women cycle the slide on all three of these pistols, and all agreed the Ruger was the most difficult. This is partially because of the small size, but it’s also because of the way the Ruger unlocks. As the unlock sequence nears completion there’s a secondary resistance that caused weaker hands to lose their grip of the slide. For older women with weak hand strength, cycling the slide might not be possible.

The Glock was certainly the easiest to shoot well, and it had the least recoil. It also had the best trigger and hand position. Shooting it felt like I was shooting a larger gun. Even though the grip is about the same length as the Bodyguard, it felt longer. I think this is because of the way the shape of the rear tang fits into the palm of my hand.

All agreed the Glock’s sights were the best, but at the expense of small size. Author Photos
All agreed the Glock’s sights were the best, but at the expense of small size. Author Photos

The Glock also clearly had the best sights, though it shot the largest group. If you look at the group, though, you’ll notice that seven bullets went into a knot with an extreme spread of just .641. I suspect I bear the responsibility for the other three shots. The Glock did experience one malfunction—a double feed on the second round from a full magazine. This happened when I was holding the gun normally. It cycled every time with the loose hold, but in one session the slide failed to lock back.

The most accurate of the three was the Bodyguard. It shot a cluster with three shots that were flyers. The total group was the smallest, but the seven-shot cluster measured only .462 center to center. At seven yards standing with a pocket pistol, this is remarkable accuracy. It also shot closest to point of aim, with the seven-shot cluster taking out the 3/4-inch aiming point almost completely.

The trigger has a long stroke, but it’s very manageable, and sights are small but easy to see and line up. It was also the easiest to stroke the slide, stroking smoothly and with a more comfortable gripping area. The safety is an added plus, and while it took a hard push to engage it, it was reasonably easy to disengage.

The Bodyguard was the overall winner, at least for me. Not as small as the Ruger, it has a slide that locks on the last round, a manual safety, good sights and trigger, and a laser to boot. It’s mid-priced of the three guns and cheaper than a Ruger LCR equipped with a laser.

A true double action with re-strike capability, the features simply outweigh the other guns. The women who handled the guns, rating slide stroke and trigger pull, all gave it the best marks. The re-strike capability is invaluable for those who aren’t the best at the tap/rack drill.

Those who have preferences towards a more manageable gun will like the Glock better. Those most interested in small size will likely go for the Ruger, and of course brand loyalty can and will play a part in an individual’s choice, but when I consider the whole package, I have to go with what the Bodyguard had to offer.

Greatest Cartridges: 6MM/.244 Remington and the Name Game

0
The 6mm/.244 Remington traveled a twisting road on its way to gaining a foothold in the shooting world.
The 6mm/.244 Remington traveled a twisting road on its way to gaining a foothold in the shooting world.

The 6mm Remington cartridge dimensions, and the .244 Remington cartridge dimensions, are exactly the same. However, rifles chambered for the cartridge and factory loaded ammo for each usually differ a bit.

The reason for this anomaly, at least to me it is an anomaly, makes an interesting story. Remington has done it at least once more that I’m aware of, and perhaps more than that. More later on this issue.

In 1955, both Remington and Winchester introduced similar 6mm cartridges to the marketplace. Winchester’s version was the .243 Winchester, and Remington dubbed their version the .244 Remington. The two cartridges were quite similar. Winchester made theirs by necking down .308 cases to 6mm and chambered its Model 70 and Model 88 lever action rifles for the new cartridge.

Many other manufacturers began chambering for the cartridge shortly thereafter. Winchester developed the cartridge as a combination varmint round using lighter weight bullets, and a light deer/antelope rifle using 100 grain bullets. Winchester fitted their rifles with a 1:10 twist barrel, which would stabilize all bullet weights suitable for both purposes.

Remington, on the other hand, saw their .244 cartridge as a varmint/predator cartridge and discounted any demand for it as a deer/antelope rifle. Therefore they fitted their rifles with a 1:12 twist, perfect for the 80-90 grain bullet weights, but wouldn’t always stabilize the 100 grain and heavier bullet weights that hunters wanted to use on deer and antelope. As the old adage goes, the rest is history. Winchester’s .243 became a very popular cartridge and Remington’s .244 almost withered on the vine, even though technically it offered slight advantages over the .243.

Remington finally saw the error of their ways and in 1963, they changed the twist from 1:12 to 1:9, which would stabilize all available 6mm bullet weights available on the market. Since they realized that the damage had already been done to the .244 Remington, they changed its name at that time to the 6mm Remington. With the head start of the .243, the 6mm Remington has never caught up with the popularity of Winchesters offering, but it has, as best I can tell, become a reasonably successful cartridge offering for Remington, as well it should.

As mentioned earlier, it offers a slight ballistic advantage over its Winchester rival. Remington chose the 7×57 Mauser cartridge as the parent case for its 6mm offering, which gives it a slightly greater powder capacity than the .308 based .243. It also provides a slightly longer cartridge neck, which most handloaders prefer, including this one. Practically speaking, however, if that is permitted these days, they are ballistic twins. What one will do, so will the other and equally well.

Remington chose the 7x57 Mauser cartridge as the parent case for its 6mm offering.
Remington chose the 7×57 Mauser cartridge as the parent case for its 6mm offering.

And now, as the late Paul Harvey used to say, “the rest of the story!”

I mentioned earlier that Remington had changed cartridge names at least one other time that I am aware of. In that case, it was with the .280 Remington, the 7mm Remington Express, and back to the .280 Remington again. You’d think they would learn. The cartridge never changed, only the name, and for different reasons than the .244 vs. 6mm Remington debacle.

Winchester introduced the .270 Winchester in 1925. I’ve written about it here in this series as it is one of my designated “greatest cartridges.” Remington did not have a really similar cartridge offering so in 1957, they introduced the .280 Remington (which had been around in a slightly different guise as the 7×64 Brenneke for even a bit longer than the .270 as it was introduced in 1917.)

The .280 is basically the .30-06 case necked down to .284” with a couple slight modifications to prevent a .270 cartridge being chambered in a .280 chamber. The resulting cartridge is a very good one, in some ways a bit better than the .270, but it has never caught up with the .270’s head start.

In an effort to boost sales, from 1979 to 1980, Remington cataloged the round as the 7mm Express Remington, which did nothing for sales and confused the hell out of a lot of folks! Again, they saw the error of their ways and went back to calling it the .280 Remington.

Modular AR Trigger: Simple AR Accuracy Upgrade

1
Aftermarket AR triggers like those from Timney are relatively easy to install. The complete process can be finished in about 15 minutes.
Aftermarket AR triggers like those from Timney are relatively easy to install. The complete process can be finished in about 15 minutes.

Probably the easiest means of bettering your trigger pull is to install a modular AR trigger assembly. These have become all the rage. Kevin Muramatsu goes over the finer points of installing this quick and easy AR-15 upgrade.

There are a number of examples available and every one of them is a genuine improvement on the factory fire control. They will either be single or two stage, though mostly single stage. They install pretty much the same all over. The point is pretty much a function of your own ease.

Emplacing a modular unit is child’s play compared to installing one of the non-modular units and is quick and simple, if somewhat more expensive at times. You pull the existing safety to the side in the same procedure you followed earlier for the non-modular units. While in some cases in the non-modular units you can get by without doing this, you will pretty much always have to do so with the modular units.

Once you have the safety and pistol grip reinstalled you simply go and shoot the gun. You don’t have to set up any adjustments (while some, notably the Timney unit, have adjustments, they are treated just like on the JP trigger, as set ups only; you don’t mess with them).

One of the original ideas was that if you had only one lower and you used it for two very different things, such as self-defense and varmint hunting, you could have two modular trigger units, one with a low pull weight for vaporizing rodents, and one with a pull weight more suitable for shooting Commies. Full brutal honesty took over and you don’t see that marketing much anymore, if only because the average AR owner typically winds up buying a second rifle for the second task. There’s not much validity in that marketing point anymore, as a result of this.

There are only two minor drawbacks to the modular trigger, since the cost in my opinion greatly offsets the installation time and hassle.

The first is that only some of them have some means of immobilizing them in the lower receiver. The ones that don’t place some sort of tension from the housing to the receiver, and will exhibit play that takes away from the quality of the trigger pull feel.

Emplacing a modular unit is child’s play compared to installing one of the non-modular units and is quick and simple, if somewhat more expensive at times.
Emplacing a modular unit is child’s play compared to installing one of the non-modular units and is quick and simple, if somewhat more expensive at times.

The other is that no modular trigger currently made can get to be quite as nice as the single install non-modular units, because each module is designed as a one-size-fits-all assembly. From a gunsmith perspective this is a big deal, but from a consumer perspective it really isn’t all that bad. The modular trigger pulls, like the non-modular units, are so far above the standard factory models in performance and feel that there’s no point in even comparing them to those antiquated, inferior things.

So after free floating your barrel and handguards, the next thing I’d recommend greatly is installing a match grade trigger. Just make sure you take the time to get used to the vastly improved trigger pull.

It’s not unusual for someone who is used to the factory stuff to finger bounce a match trigger, just because it is so much more refined. This is a good time to remember to keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to fire, and then be in for a world of goodness when you have a crisp, light, quality trigger release.

This article is an excerpt from Gun Digest Guide to Customizing Your AR-15.

Video: Remington’s Squirrely Air Gun Ad is Nuts

0

Need a good laugh?

Remington can fix you up with one of the funnier advertising campaigns to come down the pike. To promote its line of air guns, Big Green has launched the “War on Squirrels”, of which the above video is part.

Yeah, they pretty much nailed squirrels.

Youth Taking Competitive Shooting by Storm

0

The kids are alright… or at least it seems that way from a recent article on a competitive shooting wunderkind.

The report on Shyanne Roberts comes from a surprising source, the former home of anti-gun blowhard Piers Morgan. There are still nits to pick, but for the most part the article by CNN’s Christina Zdanowicz on the budding shooting star was positive.

Roberts has gripping story, at just 10-years-old she is hanging with some of the big guns of competitive shooting:

Shyanne competes alongside junior shooters, who are participants younger than 18, and even adults. Last year, she beat out adult women to place second in the Women’s Division of the New Jersey Ruger Rimfire Challenge.

On October 31, she will square off against 200 of the top women shooters at the Brownell’s Lady 3-Gun Pro-Am Challenge in Covington, Georgia. Shyanne is the youngest competitive shooter registered at the female-only event, according to the match director. The top shooter has a chance to win $5,000, as well as items from a prize table of guns, ammo and more.

Of course there is a mentor to the story. In this case Roberts’ father played an influential role in her becoming a hot shot:

The Franklinville, New Jersey, girl, who now has more than 20 sponsors, started learning gun safety when she was 5. After she could recite the rules and had grasped what guns can do, around age 6, her father started taking her to a gun range. Dan Roberts is a certified firearms instructor and a single dad. He has custody of Shyanne and her younger brother.

Shyanne’s natural talent turned into a passion and at 7, the young athlete started competing in local matches. Physically, a competitive shooter needs to have good hand and forearm strength, as well as the ability to handle the firearm’s sometimes-strong recoil. Good technique also helps.

Naturally, this being from “The Media”, there are some sections that will get gun owners’ gritting their teeth. Really, did the Brady Campaign need to be quoted for this story? (Sigh.)

Despite the expected media hand wringing and pearl clutching, the article is worth a read. All in all, Roberts’ early success is well and rightfully documented. Hopefully she’ll keep making competitive shooting headlines in the years to come.


Gun Digest 2015

Gun Digest 2015, 69th Annual Edition

 

Why Gun Suppressors Are Good

10
DoD Photo.
DoD Photo.

Suppressed can be a tricky word by its definition and in most uses connotates something that is a negative, such as “the team of lawyers suppressed the evidence” or “the government suppressed the people’s rights.” But I am here to tell you that suppression, provided by gun suppressors, is a very good thing.

I recently enjoyed the opportunity to host a group of friends, mostly women, all of whom either had little experience with firearms or were all-out first time shooters. To help with the instruction and join in on the fun was Oceana Pawn & Gun gunsmith, Kurt Derwort, a former Naval armorer who worked out of Dam Neck in Virginia Beach, Va.

To get the new shooters more comfortable with guns in general and ease them into the experience, after a safety briefing, Kurt pulled out a Ruger .22 with an integrally suppressed barrel. He then guided the newest shooter in the group in how to shoot a gun that reduced the already fairly quiet rimfire to all of the noise of a pellet gun. Not distracted by a loud bang or any type of recoil, she chewed the target up.

Before the afternoon was over, Kurt pulled out a suppressed .223, which tricked out with a bipod, suppressor and variable magnification optic, looks like a pit bull, but as the group of shooters quickly realized, shoots with the gentleness of a golden retriever. Without a doubt, the suppressed guns were the highlight of the day, and for good reason.

Not only did they make the guns less intimidating to the less experienced shooters, but they made shooting in a group much more enjoyable. Hearing protection wasn’t as critical, people could stand in the background and still carry on conversations, Kurt could deliver instruction much more easily, and the neighbors down the street probably appreciated the reduced sound as well.

In Europe, it’s considered impolite to shoot a gun without a suppressor. America would do well to follow their example.

What are your thoughts? Log in and leave a comment below.

Video: Hornady Teases 2015 Ammo and Reloading Tool Roster

0


Hornady fans get ready to update your wish lists, because the Nebraska-based manufacturer has released its new product video.

As far as the new wares, the company has slew of pre-loaded ammunition on its roster for 2015. On this end, the release of Critical Defense ammo for the .357 Magnum is sure to get many wheelgunner’s hearts soaring.

Reloading wise, the company looks to score points with those who fire off their share of military ammo. Hornady is set to release a primer pocket swage tool that works with its progressive Lock-N-Load AP press.

If removing the crimp on brass is anything as remotely quick as what is demonstrated in the video the swage tool should be a huge time saver. It will be available in both .223/5.56 and .308/7.62.

Check out the entire video to see what else is coming out of the corn fields of central Nebraska.


ultimat-reloading

Reloading Ultimate Collection — Six incredible resource to load up your ammo knowledge.

 

Browning Set to Release a 1911 .380 ACP

3

The leaves are changing color and the days are getting shorter, which means only one thing – the gun industry is teasing products it will release next year.

One of the most recent goodies to come out of Morgan, Utah is certain to stir the pot. Browning is set to expand its Black Label brand with the addition of a 1911 .380 ACP.

Shooters looking for a smaller option in the iconic pistol might have reason to rejoice with the new handgun. On the flip side, 1911 purest are certain to grumble at the audacity of chambering the pistol in anything but .45 ACP.

Of course, the company’s new endeavor is quintessentially John M. Browning, given the prolific designer engineered both the 1911 pistol and .380 cartridge.

Browning putting together smaller-caliber 1911s is nothing new. The company released a .22 version to kick off 2011 that has proven widely popular.

The new 1911 .380 has the same proportions as the rimfire version, which Browning puts at 85 percent the size of a full-sized 1911. The handgun measures in at 7.5 inches in length, it has 4.25-inch barrel, it weighs in at 17.5 ounces and it has a 7-round capacity.

The pistol’s frame is made of aluminum-reinforced polymer and boasts an ambidextrous thumb safety. The initial MSRP on the new 1911 is $670.

Expand Your Knowledge on .380 ACP Firearms and Ammo

Market Trends: High-End 1911 Pistols Moving in Buckeye State

0

1911 Pistol.Rex A. GoreBlack Wing Shooting Center, Delaware, Ohio

American’s have a passion for 1911 pistols, no surprise there. How much so can be demonstrated, in part, by Rex Gore.

The CEO of Black Wing Shooting Center has seen plenty of the pistols fly off his shelves this year. And when it comes to the iconic 1911, shooters a willing to shell out the big bucks for the best names.

“We have done very well with the higher-end 1911-style 45’s, selling Wilson Combat, Nighthawk and Ed Brown’s as soon as shipments arrive,” Gore said. “These $2,500 to $5,000 guns are selling better than the lower price point 1911’s, like Colt and Ruger.”

The 1911 pistol’s sales stand in contrast of the rest of Black Wing’s sales.

Earlier this year, Gore rated sales over this recent winter as “soft,” and though the very cold, extremely harsh weather kept a number of potential customers home.

Overall, sales numbers here are tracking to a 5-10 percent increase over the same months in 2012, and are down from the record sales months of 2013.

As in most of the nation, Black Wing is experiencing very strong sales in concealed carry handguns, especially for Sauer P238 and P938’s, plus Glock 41 and 42’s.

Used gun sales have declined here, “only because we can’t get enough quality used guns to sell,” Gore notes.

“Throughout 2013 we saw a decline in used guns available to purchase, as people seemed to be holding on to what they have. However, as we get them in, used guns move very fast,” he said.

MUST READ ARTICLES