Home Blog Page 401

U.S. Customs Seeks to Prohibit Assisted Opening Knives

0

Assisted opening knives could be reclassified as illegal switchblades if a measure proposed by United States Customs and Border Protection (Customs) becomes law.

On May 21, Customs proposed a revision of what constitutes a switchblade (click here to read the proposal). This new interpretation would deem assisted opening knives, as well as those featuring one-hand operation, illegal per the U.S. Switchblade Act of 1958.

Specifically, Customs seeks “revocation of four ruling letters and revocation of treatment relating to the admissibility of certain knives with spring-assisted opening mechanisms.” Those four ruling letters do not classify assisted openers as switchblades.

The current federal definition of a switchblade is any knife that opens automatically using gravity, inertia or hand pressure to a button or device on the handle. Assisted openers and one-hand operation knives rely on studs, grooves or other devices attached to the blade to open. These blades must be manipulated by hand to open.

If enacted, the Customs proposal would effect the 35.6 million people who own one-hand operation knives, according to the American Knife & Tool Institute (AKTI). Furthermore, Knife Rights indicates roughly 80 percent of all knives sold in the United States use one-hand operation. The knife industry as a whole employs 24,000 people and contributes an estimated $8 billion annually to the economy, according to Knife Rights.

Both knife advocacy groups are voicing opposition to the measure.

“The [Federal Switchblade] Act is very clear that a switchblade must have an activating button on the handle,” a post on Knife Rights's Web site states. “Without a button, it is not a switchblade and this has been upheld by numerous cases on many levels over the years. CBP's convoluted reasoning in their proposal to reach back beyond the law and to expand their regulatory purview by rationalizing ‘intent' as justification for this new interpretation is a stretch, at best, and illegitimate at worst.”

AKTI filed for an extension of the 30-day minimum public comment period required of Customs. That period ends June 21. AKTI is also drafting an official response to the proposal.

Action

Comments regarding the Customs proposal can be sent to the following address:

19  CFR  Part 177
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Office of International Trade, Regulations and Rulings
Attention: Intellectual Property and Restricted Merchandise Branch
Mint Annex,   799 Ninth St. N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20229

Comments will be accepted only through traditional mail until June 21, unless the extension filed by AKTI is approved. Click here for a sample letter from Knife Rights.

History

This is not the first time Customs sought to restrict assisted opening knives. In 2000, Customs seized 80,000 Columbia River Knife and Tool (CRKT) knives. Over a 16-day period, CRKT lost roughly $1 million in sales due to the seizure, according to AKTI. Customs eventually released the knives back to CRKT.

Obama Move Would Eliminate 8 of 10 Pocketknives

0

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency is proposing a new definition that could be used to eliminate 8 of 10 legal pocketknives in the United States right now, according to activists who are gearing up to fight the plan.

The federal bureaucracy is accepting comments – written only – that must be received by June 21 before its planned changes could become final, but Doug Ritter of KnifeRights.org, said the implications of the decision would be far-reaching, since many state and federal agencies depend on the agency's definitions to determine what is legal in the United States.

For a long time, those switchblades that have long stiletto blades that are spring-ejected powerfully from the side or end of the handle have been illegal in the United States, but now a review by the agency of its own approval in 2008 of a particular type of knife for import is raising serious alarms.

Ritter said the effect of the proposed change would be that the new design in knives, many of which contain a tiny spring to help the user pull open the blade and lock it into position, would be classified alongside those true weapons where the user just presses a button and the blade is ejected. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency is proposing a new definition that could be used to eliminate 8 of 10 legal pocketknives in the United States right now, according to activists who are gearing up to fight the plan.

The federal bureaucracy is accepting comments – written only – that must be received by June 21 before its planned changes could become final, but Doug Ritter of KnifeRights.org, said the implications of the decision would be far-reaching, since many state and federal agencies depend on the agency's definitions to determine what is legal in the United States.

For a long time, those switchblades that have long stiletto blades that are spring-ejected powerfully from the side or end of the handle have been illegal in the United States, but now a review by the agency of its own approval in 2008 of a particular type of knife for import is raising serious alarms.

Ritter said the effect of the proposed change would be that the new design in knives, many of which contain a tiny spring to help the user pull open the blade and lock it into position, would be classified alongside those true weapons where the user just presses a button and the blade is ejected.

They are saying that any knife that you can open quickly or any knife that you can open with one hand is therefore a switchblade,” Ritter told WND.

On his organization's website there are suggested letters for consumers to reproduce and dispatch to both the Customs agency as well as their members of Congress over the issue. Read more

Source: Worldnetdaily.com

 

Gun Digest the Magazine June 22, 2009

0

Gun Digest is the source for firearms news, pricing and guns for sale. Readers benefit from in-depth editorial expert advice, show reviews and practical how-to instructions. Subscriptions are the First Amendment way to stand up for your Second Amendment rights. Click here to begin your subscription to Gun Digest.

Inside This Issue

• Editor Kevin Michalowski talks gun rights and the media in his “Editor's Shot” column. Click here to read it.

• New airguns for 2009

• Rifles: Harrington & Richardson
• Shotguns: Arrieta and Baker
• Handguns: Smith & Wesson

• Used guns for sale

• Colt's new rail gun

• New gear for shooters

• Towsley on Target: Bond, James Bond

• Army seeks new rifle for M-4

Click here to load up on a subscription.

State Senate Passes Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act

0

Senate Bill 1610, known as the “Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act,” sponsored by Senator Mae Beavers, “takes a step in the right direction to restore to the states control of intra-state commerce and the regulation of firearms manufactured and sold within Tennessee,” she said.

“Be it the federal government mandating changes in order for states to receive federal funds or the federal government telling us how to regulate commerce contained completely within this state – enough is enough,” urged Judiciary Chairman Beavers. “Our founders fought too hard to ensure states’ sovereignty and I am sick and tired of activist federal officials and judges sticking their noses where they don’t belong.”

The Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act asserts that if a firearm and/or ammunition is made totally within the state of Tennessee, and stamped ‘Made in Tennessee,' then the federal government has no jurisdiction over that item in any fashion so long as it remains in state and outside of interstate commerce. All state regulations applying to the possession of firearms in Tennessee would still be applicable and must be complied with.

“This legislation is being proposed to prevent a federal attempt to legislate beyond the Constitutional limits of Congress.

“The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people to the federal government, and also that which is absolutely necessary to advancing those powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution of the United States. Read more

Source: thechattanoogan.com

Gaddy College of Self-Defense

0

Often, people make the mistake of thinking they can just have a loaded pistol on a nightstand and a rifle standing in the corner and they’re good to go. Not true.

Individuals must be mentally prepared as well as proficient in the use of their firearms. You owe it to yourself to seek additional, specialized training to develop a mindset of preparedness and preservation. That’s where a top-notch instructor comes into play. You should seek a mentor who will teach you the mental preparation aspects of self-defense as well as the act of mastering your firearm(s).

A one-on-one session, or a session with a small group of people, is invaluable for receiving personal insight and understanding where you are in terms of vigilance. Gaddy ran our small group through a series of drills over two days, and he schooled his trainees to think about and deal with various real-life scenarios and potential weaknesses.

We practiced shooting behind barriers, shooting without using the sights, and using our weak hands, and these are all things that a lot of folks don’t think about often enough. We also rehearsed the act of picking out friendly vs. enemy targets under pressure. We created ways to raise our heartbeat (running sprints) before shooting to try and simulate the adrenaline rush that someone in the act of self-defense will experience.

Perhaps some of the most valuable guidance you can procure from a solid instructor comes during an informal question-and-answer period that allows you pick an experienced mind. It is often difficult to get top-flight training that is not loaded with politically correct talking points and government licensing propaganda.

I’ve been fed this nonsense before. Michael Gaddy didn’t waste our time with such phooey. The right to defend oneself is a natural right and thus it does not come from the permission of any government or licensing body. Gaddy reflects the sort of philosophy that you’d expect from a popular and relentless freedom activist.

In addition, a person who is truly pro-liberty will not waste your time telling you to email your congressman. Due to the fact that there is currently no support for gun control legislation in Congress, the president of the United States is pushing an international treaty that will bypass Congress and can be ratified with Senate approval.

This treaty seeks to disarm Americans. The regime in power is desperate to commence absolute gun control and will do so in any manner possible. Now is the time to prepare to resist any such maneuver. Read more

Source: lewrockwell.com

Wisconsin Castle Doctrine and Micro-stamping Hearings Update

0

The Committee on Personal Privacy held a public hearing on our Castle Doctrine bill, AB 193.  Many NRA Members turned out to participate in the public hearing and show their support for the bill.

AB 193 has been referred to a subcommittee to address concerns brought up in committee regarding the scope of the bill.

AB 193 would allow a person to defend themselves in their residence and includes a prohibition on civil lawsuits from criminals, or their families, who are injured while committing a crime.

Microstamping Technology
The second hearing held by the Committee on Criminal Justice was to discuss a possible micro-stamping bill.

The hearing was widely attended, with the majority of attendees speaking against the proposed bill.  There were, however, a handful of proponents, including a patent holder of “microstamping” technology and few law enforcement officials.

The committee members did a great job of questioning these proponents as to the necessity and benefits of implementing a technology that has been consistently proven expensive and unreliable.

At this time no formal bill has been filed in support of this issue.

Source: nraila.org.

California Ammo Bill Would Hurt Gun Owners

0

In California, an anti-ammunition piece of legislation, Assembly Bill 962, passed the state Assembly last week and moved to the state Senate for consideration. Introduced by Assemblyman Kevin DeLeon (D-45th Dist.), the bill would, according to The Sun:

“Stop the sale of more than 50 rounds of handgun ammunition per month to individuals… license and tax anyone selling handgun ammunition commercially and force these stores to get background checks on anyone selling that ammunition….require ammunition sellers to get a thumbprint from anyone buying handgun ammunition, and mandate store owners to keep these records for five years… ban all ammunition sales that don't take place face-to-face, effectively banning all mail-order sales.”

If the bill became law, the paperwork burden placed upon these businesses, and the associated costs, would be huge. No doubt, some retail establishments would leave the ammunition-selling business altogether.

Which may be the real point of that bill? That was what Sun writer Jim Matthews believed.

De Leon’s bill, Matthew’s argued, “is about a legislator who doesn't have the courage to introduce legislation to ban handguns. That's what he wants, but he realizes that even in his liberal Los Angeles district that stand would get him kicked out of office in the next election. This is his way to get at gun owners and sellers by making their lives more difficult and expensive.”

Source: sbsun.com

No One Attacked at Michigan Open Carry Picnic

0

Kalamazoo, Michigan — A group of gun owners in West Michigan are speaking up for their rights, and they're doing it in a unique way.

More than 30 people gathered in Bronson Park in Kalamazoo Sunday. They say they want everyone to understand what the Second Amendment means to them.

Open Carry held a group picnic: bring a dish to pass, and don't forget your side-arm. Legal gun owners carried their guns in a legal, visible way. The sight of a gun in the open may draw concern from the general public. Robert Grinage of Kalamazoo says he's gotten a couple of strange looks. “I started open-carrying in March of this year – what my thing is is we have a right and if we don't use it, we're going to end up losing it,” Robert Grinage told FOX 17 News.

Michigan law says you can carry your gun openly; you can't wave it or take it out in a threatening manner. “We are a non-confrontational group so all we are doing is carrying openly instead of carrying concealed and anybody who is legally allowed to purchase a firearm is legally allowed to carry it open,” picnic organizer Josh Tishouse says. Read more and watch the video

Source: wxmi

Rock Island Launches Huge Gun Auction

0

Search over 4200 guns in the Rock Island AuctionsPlan to attend this event! It is an exciting time for firearms collectors, sportsman and hunters and our last regional auction had standing room only!

Browse over 4200 firearms in only 2100 lots, bid on your favorite military, hunting, sporting or antique firearm(s) and accessories! Mark your calendar, this is an event that you don’t want to miss!

Over 2100 lots including 3200+ items classified as antique or curio and relic and 1000+ modern arms will be sold during this 2 day event.

Some of the featured items will include: 400+ Winchesters, 450+ Colts, 300+ Smith & Wessons, 250+ Remingtons as well as many Rugers, Brownings, Marlins, Mausers, Stevens, Savage and more.

Plus ammunition, bullet molds, books, knives, swords, scopes, bayonets, holsters, cannons, collectible military items, gun parts and much more! The entire full color catalog is available online www.rockislandauction.com or call 800-238-8022 to order your 2 volume set $35 (inc. S&H).

The auction will be held at our facilities in Moline: 4507 49th Avenue, Moline, IL. For more information on this sale visit us online or call 800-238-8022. Can’t attend? You won’t miss out! As always you can submit your absentee bids through phone (800-238-8022), fax (309-797-1500) and our website! For the first time, you can now bid live through artfact.com!

Shop and bid now »

Military Bases Registering Soldiers’ Guns

0

Another major U.S. military base is requiring soldiers who live off the premises to provide descriptions, serial numbers, calibers, makes and models of any of the guns they own privately, and do not take onto the premises of the installation.

According to a copy of a “Weapons Registration Form” submitted to WND by a soldier from Fort Bliss in Texas, the soldiers have to provide their own information including Social Security number, a physical description and addresses and telephone numbers, along with the serial number, type, action, make, caliber, finish, location stored, model, overall length and barrel description of each weapon they own.

Base public information officer Jean Offutt told WND that registration of privately owned weapons is suggested and recommended, but there's no enforcement procedures available to the military if someone chooses not to submit that off-post information.

However, the form used for the registrations states in one paragraph, “Soldiers who reside off post will register all privately owned weapons/firearms with the PMO. This requirement applies whether or not the service member intends to bring the weapon onto the installation for any recreational or other use.”

A spokesman at Army headquarters, Lt. Col. Lee Packnett, told WND that he wasn't aware of a systemwide effort to have solders' privately owned weapons registered, but confirmed that individual installations could be taking that action. Read more

Source: worldnetdaily.com

 

Sotomayor Needs to Answer For Anti-Gun Views

0

This week a federal appeals court held that the Second Amendment does not apply to state or city gun laws. Supporters of Judge Sonia Sotomayor incorrectly argue that this affirms her recent gun-control case. Now the NRA is petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case, and in doing so heats up the gun-rights issue to potentially become the dominant topic in Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings.

On June 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit handed down its decision in NRA v. Chicago. The city of Chicago has a ban on handguns almost as severe as the one invalidated by the Supreme Court last year in D.C. v. Heller. The National Rifle Association filed suit, seeking to have the Chicago gun ban struck down.

The Seventh Circuit held that the Second Amendment right to bear arms does not apply to state or city laws. All three judges on the panel hearing the case were appointed by Republican presidents. In January, Sotomayor was on a three-judge panel from the Second Circuit that similarly held that the Second Amendment affects only federal law, not state or local law. Supporters of Sotomayor are touting the Chicago ruling as proof that her Second Circuit case, Maloney v. Cuomo, was a mainstream opinion, arguing that the Seventh Circuit agrees with her.

But that’s not exactly correct. It’s true that both courts reached the same conclusion. It’s also fair to say that this is not a “pro-gun” opinion, so gun owners shouldn’t be thrilled with it. But it’s not an “anti-gun” ruling, either. The circuit court here released a nine-page analysis delving into this issue in an even-handed manner, written by one of the best-regarded appellate judges in the nation.

Originally, the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government. Then during the 1900s, the Supreme Court began applying (or “incorporating”) most of the Bill of Rights to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Before that time, the Supreme Court had held back in 1876, and again in 1886, that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. But it never had an occasion to revisit the Second Amendment during the 1900s incorporation cases. It also did not need to do so last year in the Heller case because Washington, D.C. is a federal enclave, not a state, and is therefore directly controlled by the Bill of Rights. Read more

Source: Fox News Blog

NRA Appeals Chicago Ruling to U.S. Supreme Court

0

Fairfax, Va. – Today, the National Rifle Association filed a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of NRA v. Chicago. The NRA strongly disagrees with yesterday's decision issued by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, holding that the Second Amendment does not apply to state and local governments.

“The Seventh Circuit got it wrong. As the Supreme Court said in last year's landmark Heller decision, the Second Amendment is an individual right that ‘belongs to all Americans'.

Therefore, we are taking our case to the highest court in the land,” said Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist. “The Seventh Circuit claimed it was bound by precedent from previous decisions.

However, it should have followed the lead of the recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Nordyke v. Alameda County, which found that those cases don't prevent the Second Amendment from applying to the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Read more

Source: National Rifle Association – Institute for Legislative Action

 

Tennessee House Overrides Veto of Guns in Bars Bill

0

The House voted 69-27 against the veto. The Senate is expected to vote on the matter Thursday.

The final version of the bill previously passed the House on a 66-23 vote. All but one of the new votes for or against the measure came from lawmakers who were absent on the previous vote.

Nashville Rep. Beth Harwell, who was the only Republican to vote against the veto override Wednesday, previously abstained.

It takes 50 votes in the House and 17 in the Senate to turn back the veto. The bill passed the Senate 24-7 last month.

“I think the people have spoken,” Republican Rep. Curry Todd of Collierville, the bill's primary sponsor, said after the vote. “This just gives folks an opportunity to protect themselves.” Read more

Source: theleafchronicle.com

Gun Shows Under Attack in California

0

But they don't think that other kinds of Cow Palace shows like RAVE concerts are a problem, or send the wrong message, and they say that people who attend those events have first amendment rights (but apparently not the people who go to gun shows).

SB585 (Leno) would ban the sale of ammunition and firearms at the state owned Cow Palace exposition facility near San Francisco. It would have the result of banning all gun shows held there, and will very likely be used as a precedent for banning gun shows at publicly owned facilities throughout the state!

Buying a firearm at a gun show is no different than going to a firearms dealer's store. Background checks and waiting periods are required for purchases at gun shows just like at a gun store.

SB585 is an attempt by anti-gun extremists to find more creative ways to discourage people from owning firearms! Like most such bills, it would have no impact on criminals, just on lawful individuals!

SB585 is on the Senate Floor and will be voted upon this week!

It is critical that all Senators be immediately contacted!

Source: ccrkba.org

Winchester Rifle Sells For $93,000

1

This 1873 Winchester, caliber .38, sold for $2200 in a recent Shobe auction held in Montana. A similar 1873 Winchester in .44 (not pictured) brought in $93,000.

A Winchester Model 1873,  “One of One Thousand,” sold for $93,000 last week at a firearm and collectible auction, in Lewistown, Mont.

The rifle owners were Walt and Pat Woodland, Belgrade, Mont., and it sold to a collector from the Seattle, Washington area. United Country – Shobe Auction & Realty conducted the auction at the Fergus County Fairgrounds, in Lewistown.

Winchester records report that this high dollar rifle was made in 1877, and shipped from the Winchester factory in 1878. Authenticity of this rifle was verified by highly regarded experts in the field and by the Winchester Museum in Cody, Wyo. This rifle was in 75% of its original condition.

The Winchester 1873 One of One Thousand is one of the most sought after and arguably one of the most handsome of all Winchesters. The One of One Thousands rifles were fitted barrels that proved to shoot a bit more accurate than the standard production barrels.

In the 1870s, Winchester wanted a special rifle to appeal to their high-end market. They tested their gun barrels for accuracy, and if a barrel did qualify to be in this special “accurate” category, they were then placed in the class called the “One of One Thousand.”

The barrels were engraved by Winchester on the top of the front end and the breech end. The stock and fore-grip were a checkered high-grade walnut.

The gun was equipped with a set trigger, ladder tang sight, a globe front sight and cleaning rod. Winchester intended to make 1000 of these guns, but the records show that only about 133 were completed, thus adding to the collector value.

The “One of One Thousands” sold for $100 back in the 1870s and 1880s. The standard quality Model 1873 sold for $18- $20 during the same time period. Granville Stuart, Montana pioneer rancher, was a proud owner of a Winchester 1873 One of One Thousand.

Jayson Shobe of United Country – Shobe Auction & Realty, Lewistown, said “It was very exciting and truly a privilege to sell a historic firearm of this quality and value. It was definitely a highlight in my auction career.”

Kyle Shobe, Jayson’s son and business partner, commented, “Winchesters are certainly an emblem of the American West. Rarely do we see such a remarkable piece, as this Winchester One of One Thousand, with so much historic value.

Just to hold this rifle in our hands was privilege enough, but the opportunity to sell it?  Once in a lifetime.”

Last Saturday’s auction was attended by 370 registered buyers, from 18 states, bidding live or via the Internet.

Olofson: Rehearing in ‘broken gun’ Conviction Refused

0
David Olofson, of Berlin, Wisconsin, was imprisoned for 30 months because his AR-15 malfunctioned.

The ruling from the court today came in the case involving David Olofson, who was sentenced to 30-months in prison for “transferring” a machinegun, even though the weapon in question was described by defense weapons experts as a rifle that misfired.

The decision from judges Dan Manion, Michael Kanne and Virginia Kendall said: “On consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc filed by defendant-appellant, no judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. The petition is therefore DENIED.”

Defense lawyers didn't immediately announce whether they would continue the fight. But WND reported earlier when a panel on the appellate bench rejected Olofson's appeal.

The panel found what a federal agent did during a testing procedure to result in “automatic” fire from an AR-15 has no bearing on Olofson's conviction.

The ruling had affirmed the trial judge's decision that the Wisconsin man sent to prison was guilty, no matter the reason that the semi-automatic rifle he loaned to a prospective buyer unleashed several bursts of multiple rounds and then jammed.

His defense team had explained the case is about nothing more than a malfunctioning gun. But according to judges Manion, Kanne and Kendall of the 7th Circuit, the weapon is a machinegun, and government information about the tests that determined that are not pertinent.

Constitutional lawyer Herb Titus, who argued at the appellate level on behalf of Olofson, said the government's case was simple: “Olofson's malfunctioning semi-automatic rifle functioned as a machinegun because it fired more than one shot at the single pull of a trigger.” Read more

Source: worldnetdaily.com

 

MUST READ ARTICLES