Home Blog Page 402

Winchester: The Collector’s Choice

0

Collecting Winchesters is fun, profitable and easier than you may think.Collecting Winchesters is fun, profitable and easier than you may think.

If you’re going to collect the early lever actions, competition exists everywhere. If you’re going to collect some of the later models, little or moderate competition is what you will find.

In addition, Winchester prices have a great deal to do with condition and factory originality, not always rarity. For example, a Winchester model 255 is quite rare, but no one seems to care. On the other hand, a standard early Winchester model 1886 is much more common than the model 255, but everyone seems to care about 1886s.

An extremely nice 1886, with just a few value-adding features, can cost as much as a brand new sports car. A mint condition model 255 Winchester usually costs less than a one-night stay at a fancy hotel.

Over the years, I have come to view some of the dichotomies in Winchester collecting – e.g., the difference in prices between Winchester Model 1886s and Winchester Model 71s -– to be very interesting.

The Winchester model 71 was created in the early 1930s using model 1886 Winchester receiver designs, with improvements, so that the rifle could handle an improved cartridge, the .348. With a little looking around, a deluxe Winchester model 71 in very nice condition can be purchased for the very modest price of under $2500. A deluxe Winchester Model 1886, depending on value-adding features to be found on the weapon, can cost 25 to 50 times more. These are the types of interesting paradoxes one finds in the world of the Winchester collector.

Even though there are some very real differences between these two rifles, I see many more deluxe Winchester model 1886s for sale than I see deluxe Winchester model 71s for sale.

Mechanically speaking, and except for a couple of the 1886s calibers, it’s much easier to find ammunition for the Model 71 than for the 1886, and in terms of hunting, the Model 71 has it hands down over the model 1886. However, this is what makes collecting Winchesters so fascinating, and so compelling.

The brass-framed Henry Rifle.
The brass-framed Henry Rifle.

Every serious Winchester collector dreams of that moment when the phone rings, and on the line is a neighbor, or someone at work, telling him that a relative has passed away and that they found a Winchester Model 1886 in the closet. They then ask him if he would like to buy the weapon for $1000, because that’s what a neighbor told him it was worth. The Winchester collector’s heart rate will increase by a minimum of 20 beats a minute then and there. If, upon inspection, the rifle’s receiver shows bright case color, the telltale band of a take-down rifle is there, the wood on the rifle is checkered, and the caliber is one of the more rare ones, the collector just might be in danger of having a heart attack.

Such is the collector’s dream – except for the heart attack part – and it happens in real life with more regularity than most people might suspect.

Model 94 1 of 1000. Closeup of left receiver. Photo courtesy of U.S. Repeating Arms Company.
Model 94 1 of 1000. Closeup of left receiver. Photo courtesy of U.S. Repeating Arms Company.

In the mid-1980s, I purchased seven mint model 1876 rifles, of which all are different, and all were deluxe models, one being a 1 of 100 model and one being a 1 of a 1000 model. I paid a total of $5000 for the seven rifles. When I think back to those glorious moments, even today, I get excited.

I still have these rifles, and they give me great pleasure and satisfaction, and I realize how lucky I was then, and how fortunate I am now.

Winchester, or U.S. Repeating Arms, closed its doors in New Haven, Connecticut effective March 31, 2006. Collectors and dealers alike, have already started to accumulate recently manufactured examples of that Model 94 rifles and carbines.

Many of these later weapons have been selling for as much as 50% over retail value. This may represent an opportunity for investment, or for collecting weapons that exist in the marketplace in rather large numbers, but, for the most part, are still very affordable.

Beware, production of these rifles may, at some point in time, recur – and if it does, it’s likely that prices will recede to approximate recent levels.

Bonded PDX: A Real Fight-Stopper

0

This new defensive handgun ammunition, adopted by the FBI, is available for handgunners everywhere.
Winchester's new self-defense Bonded PDF is a real fight-stopper.

Terminal performance. It’s what every savvy handgunner expects out of the ammunition he or she carries for personal protection, and a new cartridge from Winchester promises to deliver the goods.

Early in 2009, during a demonstration for me and several other gun writers, Winchester showed what this stuff could do, and it was impressive. We’re talking deep penetration, very good expansion and velocity that packs a punch.

Winchester’s bonded PDX1 ammunition is available in four calibers and six different loadings (two each in 9mm and .40 S&W). If you own a handgun in 9mm, .40 S&W, .38 Special or .45 ACP and want a load that will stop an attacker, this may be what you’re looking for, as it certainly stacks up to other personal defense ammunition, or better.

Now that is penetration! The Winchester Bonded PDX traveled 12 inches into the gel block.
Now that is penetration! The Winchester Bonded PDX traveled 12 inches into the gel block.

Why am I devoting much of a column to this stuff? Winchester did not provide me with a bunch of free ammunition, I don’t own stock in the company, nor is this treatise linked to any advertising. The stuff just plain got my attention, and if the FBI is loading its guns with this round, there’s a reason.

At the range, we watched as .40-caliber, 180-grain loads were fired into blocks of ballistic gelatin. The bullets consistently penetrated to about 11.5-12 inches, which is ample to punch deep into, if not through, most humans. En route, it raises hell with whatever is in the way by expanding dramatically. If that’s not the recipe for stopping a fight immediately, it is pretty darned close!

Velocities were right up there at 990 to 1,000 fps, which is what one should expect out of a .40-caliber projectile fired from the typical defensive handgun built for that cartridge, with a 4- to 4.5-inch barrel.

Here are the options: In 9mm, there’s a Plus-P load with a 124-grain JHP, and a standard load with a 147-grain JHP. For you .40-caliber fans, in addition to the 180-grainer mentioned above, there is a 165-grain JHP. Those packing .38 Special revolvers ought to warm right up to the 130-grain JHP load, while those of us who carry a .45 ACP pistol have a 230-grain JHP to load in our magazines.

Winchester developed the bonded PDX1 with a proprietary process that joins the lead core to the jacket for controlled expansion and weight retention. Expansion is the result of a good hollow point cavity that works in combination with the carefully notched jacket that is made from a copper alloy and divided into six segments.

Winchester Centerfire Products Manager Glen Weeks told me that the PDX1 had been under development for about two years. The project was aimed at providing a round the FBI would adopt, and this meant it had to perform on penetration tests against steel car doors and windshields.

“Glass is hands down the toughest thing you have to go through,” Weeks observed. “There are .38s that will bounce off windshield glass.”

The vast majority of armed citizens load their defensive handguns with factory ammunition. On the street in my .45 ACP, I go with factory loads, while in the backcountry — where I suspect any defensive encounters would most likely be against four-legged predators — I load up my .357 Magnum or .41 Magnum with handloads using reliable data from my reloading manuals and projectiles developed for maximum tissue damage; the same loads I use for handgun hunting.

If I were limited to factory ammunition only — that is, if I didn’t reload ammunition for hunting and long-range target shooting — there is little doubt that high on my list of ammunition choices would be the new Winchester Bonded PDX1. Available in 20-round boxes, this is a cartridge that promises to have a distinguished career.

Gun Rights: Coburn vs. Sotomayor

0

Sotomayor started with her usual answer that judges don't make law. And she noted that the federal government and many states have laws restricting guns, such as possession of firearms by felons. Then the sparing got more interesting.

“Do I have a right to personal self-defense?” Coburn asked.

Sotomayor: “That's an abstract question.” Read more

Source: yahoo news

Florida Gun Owner Kills Suspected Intruder

0

Police say the 72-year-old resident shot the 37-year-old man in the upper body Sunday night. A neighbor reported hearing six shots.

Police are investigating the circumstances of the shooting. Read more

Source: miamiherald.com

Reloading: The .223 Remington (5.56x45mm)

0
The 223 Remington is nearly identical to the 222 Remington Magnum, the only difference being that the 223 has a slightly shorter case.
The 223 Remington is nearly identical to the 222 Remington Magnum, the only difference being that the 223 has a slightly shorter case.

Historical Notes
The 223 Remington first appeared in 1957 as an experimental military cartridge for the Armalite AR-15 assault rile. In 1964, it was officially adopted by the U.S. Army as the 5.56mmBall cartridge M193. It is used in the selective-fire M16 rile which is based on the original AR-15 design. The cartridge was the work of Robert Hutton, who was technical editor of Guns & Ammo magazine and had a rifle range in Topanga Canyon, California.

One of the requirements for the cartridge was that the projectile have are tainted velocity in excess of the speed of sound (about 1,080 fps atsea level) at 500 yards, something you could not achieve with the 222 Remington. Working with Gene Stoner of Armalite, Bob Hutton designed a case slightly longer than the 222 and had Sierra make a 55-grain boat tail bullet. This combination met the design requirements. All this was documented in the 1971 issue of the Guns & Ammo Annual. Originally an alternative military cartridge, the 223 (5.56x45mm) is now the official U.S. and NATO military round.

We should note here that NATO forces, including theUnited States, have standardized a new 5.56x45mm round with aheavy bullet and the M193 is no longer standard. Shortly after the military adopted this cartridge, Remington brought out the sporting version, which has largely replaced both the 222 Remington and Remington Magnum in popularity. Practically every manufacturer of bolt-action rifles has at least one model chambered for the 223. In addition, there are a large number of military-type semi-auto rifles available in this caliber. At one time, the Remington Model 760 pump-action was available in 223.

General Comments

The 223 Remington is nearly identical to the 222 Remington Magnum, the only difference being that the 223 has a slightly shorter case. The two are not interchangeable, although the 223 will chamber in a 222 Magnum rifle. The result, though, is to create a gross headspace condition, and the 223 case can rupture if fired in the 222 Magnum chamber.

The 223 has proven to be an effective military cartridge for fighting in jungle or forested areas and for close-in fire support, and has been improved lately by NATO with heavier (SS109 designed by FN of Belgium) bullets fired through fast-twist (1 in 7-inch) barrels. As a sporting round, it is just as accurate as any of the other long-range, centerfire 22s. Military brass cases are sometimes heavier than commercial cases, so maximum loads should be reduced by at least 10 percent and approached cautiously. That is because the reduced case capacity results in a higher loading density and increased pressure with the same powder charge. The 223 Remington can be classed as an excellent medium-range varmint cartridge at ranges out to 250 yards.

In 1979, SAAMI cautioned shooters that 5.56x45mm military chambers and throats differ from 223 Remington sporting rifle chambers. Therefore military ball ammo may produce high chamber pressures in sporting rifles.

Sotomayor Takes Axe to Second Amendment

0

Source: Gun Owners of America

The U.S. Senate must vote NO on Judge Sonia Sotomayor!

In defending her decision that the states could enact any form of gun control they wished — with absolutely no regard to the Second Amendment — Judge Sonya Sotomayor has developed a new love for Nineteenth Century court opinions.

Demonstrating that she was programmed in her responses, Sotomayor defended one of her earlier legal opinions by citing “footnote 23” of Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion in the DC v. Heller case
last year.

But, when pressed by questioner Orrin Hatch yesterday, Sotomayor could not recite the contents of that footnote or the holdings of the cases which it cited.  As it turns out, the footnote on which Sotomayor claims to rely, cited — without approval — two Nineteenth Century cases which rejected the notion that the Second Amendment was ‘incorporated' to apply to the states.

But those were also the days when the Supreme Court held that the rights protected in the First Amendment did not apply to the states.

Apparently, Sotomayor wants to base her anti-gun philosophy on antiquated decisions from an era when the U.S. Supreme Court was spitting out racist decisions.

Her answers got even worse today when Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma asked her, point blank, “Is there a constitutional right to self-defense?”  Sotomayor said that was an “abstract
question” and that she couldn't think of a Supreme Court case that addressed that issue.

Coburn said he didn't want a legal treatise on what Supreme Court holdings have said, rather, he wanted her own personal opinion.  Sotomayor would not answer the question, although when pressed, she equated self-defense with vigilantism!

Folks, do you see how important it is to stop this nomination?  GOA mailed its members postcards opposing Sotomayor not too long ago.

Please make sure you have mailed those in.  We need a multi-pronged  offensive right now where our Senators are receiving snail mail, email and phone calls.

And, we need ALL PRO-GUN ORGANIZATIONS to take a stance AGAINST this nominee.

Organizational spokesmen can talk a good game and say they have serious “concerns” about Sotomayor.  That's all well and good.  But unless those organizations (big and small) rate each Senator's vote on Sotomayor — when she's clearly anti-gun — then those supposed “concerns” are just meaningless.

Senators have to hear from ALL the pro-gun organizations — big and small — that they are going to rate this vote during the 2010 election.  Otherwise, those organizations are just Paper Tigers.

We can't let this anti-gun judge infiltrate U.S. Supreme Court!  She is dangerous on so many levels — but, especially, on Second Amendment rights.

GOA considers her nomination to be of the most important gun votes in the HISTORY of the US Senate.  We can't think of any other nominee in recent history who has taken such a horrid stand on the basic right of self-defense.

She says that she will follow the precedent in the DC v. Heller (2008) case.  But even if she does, that only means that she will vote to apply the Second Amendment in Washington, DC.  She has already ruled this year in Maloney v. Cuomo that the amendment doesn't apply to where you live.

Sotomayor Nomination Today: Opposition Needed!

0

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
https://www.gunowners.org

“I will be talking [to Judge Sotomayor] about the question of
foreign law and the question of [her] commitment to the Second
Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms….  President Obama, who
nominated Judge Sotomayor, has a rather limited view of what the Second
Amendment guarantees.” — Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), June 2009

Monday, July 13, 2009

In many ways, Sotomayor's views are out-of-step with our American
heritage and with the views of Americans in general.  For example,
Sotomayor believes that our fundamental law is constantly evolving and
that rights are constantly changing with the times.

But should we be surprised?  The President who nominated her holds some
of the most radical views ever held by a resident of the White House.
His take on the Constitution — and the Second Amendment in particular
— has stationed him to the far left on the political spectrum.

Consider just a small snapshot of his record over the years:

* As President, Obama has nationalized much of the car and banking
industry and is now looking to do the same with health care.  Even the
Marxist President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, joked on live television
last month that he and Fidel Castro need to be careful or else “we
are going to end up to [Obama's] right.”

* As a U.S. Senator, Obama was ranked by the National Journal in 2007
as the most liberal legislator in that chamber.  Realize that such a
ranking put Obama to the left of 99 other Senators — including an
open, self-avowed socialist, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

* Like many socialists, Obama has supported some of the most extreme
positions on gun control:  supporting a ban on handguns, opposing the
repeal of the draconian DC gun ban, opposing the right of self-defense
for residents in the Chicago suburbs, and much more.

Obama's brand of far-left politics sees the Constitution as moldable as
a ball of wax.  In a 2001 interview, he criticized earlier Supreme
Courts for “never ventur[ing] into the issues of redistribution of
wealth….  It didn't break free from the essential constraints that
were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.”

Sotomayor appears to have the same view of our highest document, as she
stated in 1996 that law is not “static and predictable,” but
“constantly overhaul[ed] and adapt[ed] [by lawyers and courts] to
the realities of ever-changing social, industrial and political
conditions.”

ACTION:  Please urge your two Senators to vote AGAINST the Sotomayor
nomination.  Tell them to cast a pro-gun vote on EVERY vote related to
Judge Sonia Sotomayor (whether it's a vote on sustaining a filibuster
or a vote on final passage).

Please use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
https://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your legislators the
pre-written e-mail message below.

—– Pre-written letter —–

Dear Senator:

Judge Sonia Sotomayor's views are out-of-step with our American
heritage and with the views of Americans in general.  Not surprisingly,
the Rasmussen polling firm reported on July 1 that more Americans
oppose her nomination than support her.

Sotomayor believes that our fundamental law is constantly evolving and
that rights are constantly changing with the times.  But a majority of
Americans disagree.  Multiple polls have found that almost
three-fourths of all Americans believe that the Second Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution protects the rights of “individuals” to own
guns.  Not so for Judge Sotomayor:

* She ruled in United States v. Sanchez-Villar (2004) that “the
right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.”

* And earlier this year, Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel
which ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not
apply to the states.  This makes her more liberal than the Ninth
Circuit, which stated in the Nordyke case in April that the Second
Amendment does apply to the states.

Please cast a pro-gun vote on EVERY vote related to Judge Sonia
Sotomayor (whether it's a vote on sustaining a filibuster or a vote on
final passage).

I would like to hear back from you on this.  Although rest assured, Gun
Owners of America will keep me up to date on any further developments.

Sincerely,

Gun Digest Gun Rights Forum »

Rise in Gun Sales Tied to Obama Fear

0

From November 2008 to May 2009, gun dealers in Sacramento County sold nearly 5,000 more guns than they did in the same period last year, an increase of 40 percent, statistics from the state Bureau of Firearms show.

The state increase in gun sales averaged 32 percent.

Sacramento County gun owners, advocates and store owners largely attribute the boom to fear.

Initially, they said, buyers were concerned that the Obama administration would support further gun controls. More recently, Sacramento County Sheriff John McGinness announced layoffs of 202 sworn deputies and 40 non-sworn personnel because of budget cuts to his department – further spurring local gun sales.

“I've noticed a tremendous change,” said Ron Herbertson, 47, a Sacramento insurance specialist and gun owner. “I was just in a gun store today – you can't find ammunition, and guns are flying off the shelves. It's hard for them to keep them in stock.”

Herbertson would not say how many guns he has bought in recent months, but he described himself as “well-equipped.”

Between November 2008 and May 2009, 15,993 handguns and long guns were sold in Sacramento County, and 314,201 were sold statewide.

“There has definitely been a dramatic increase in consumer desire for firearms and ammunition,” said Chuck Michel, attorney for the California Rifle and Pistol Association, a 45,000-member organization that promotes firearm safety and gun rights. “It is motivated primarily by a fear of what ill-conceived gun laws the Obama administration might propose, but it's also attributable to a fear of a rise in crime from a bad economy and less money for police.” Read more »

Source: Sacramento Bee

 

Give Me a Lever

0
The clean, flat receiver of the Mossberg Model 464, showing the beefed-up receiver rings.
The clean, flat receiver of the Mossberg Model 464, showing the beefed-up receiver rings.

Yep, I said second try. Back in the mid-1970s, Mossberg introduced their Model 472 lever-action. Chambered in .30-30 Winchester or .35 Remington, the Model 472 was available in a number of configurations until being phased out altogether in 1983 with a final 5000-piece run of Roy Rogers commemoratives. Often encountered under the “Western Field” brand name, the Model 472 is remembered today mostly as a competent, respectable little carbine more than a little reminiscent of  Marlin's similar Model 336.

Like the Model 472, the Model 646 is a competent, respectable little carbine. Mossberg insists that their new lever gun was already well under development when Winchester discontinued the sainted Model 94 in early 2006, but it's inevitable that the Model 464 will be seen as the Model 94's successor. In that role it succeeds rather well.

Let me make clear that I'm talking about the post-1964 Winchester Model 94. Mossberg stresses “affordability” as one of the key features of the Model 464, so if you're looking for bluing so deep you can swim around in it and Grade AA Fancy claro walnut, you're going to have to keep waiting or buy a high-end pre-1964 Winchester. Like most Mossbergs, the 464 is a working gun, and if you're looking for more than that you may be living in the wrong decade, if not the wrong century.

After spending a few afternoons on the range with the new Model 464, all I can tell you is that it performs as advertised, which is an increasingly rare characteristic for any new product, firearm or otherwise. For the beginner, the once- or twice-a-year deer hunter, the woods bum or the recreational shooter who wants something with more oomph than a .22 for plinking or competition, the Model 464 is an admirable little gun.

First, the basics: the Model 464 is chambered only in .30-30 Winchester, at least as of this writing. It has a 20-inch round barrel and iron sights, though its receiver is drilled and tapped for scope mounts — not side mounts but top mounts. Unlike Marlin's competing Model 336, the 464 has a straight-grip stock, which has always seemed (to me, anyway) to be more accommodating to various body types than stocks with pistol grips. As to the wood, well, it's that classic “hardwood” we've all come to know so well, and it serves its purpose.

One nice touch is the soft, serrated rubber recoil pad that gives the rifle a snug, non-slip feel.

Mossberg’s new Model 464 .30-30 is an excellent choice for a youngster’s first deer rifle.
Mossberg’s new Model 464 .30-30 is an excellent choice for a youngster’s first deer rifle.

Magazine capacity of the Model 464 is 6+1 rounds and, unlike some lever-actions I've fired recently, you don't have to be Charles Atlas to force cartridges into the loading gate.

There is no half-cock hammer safety; the only manual safety is an unobtrusive tang slider that lies naturally under the thumb. Some lever fans are going to complain about the safety, just as they did when Marlin introduced the crossbolt safety on its 336-series rifles way back in 1984. To me, a tang safety is much handier than a receiver-mounted crossbolt, and it looks better, too.

It's a hammer-block safety, so the trigger will pull and the rebounding hammer will fall even when the safety is engaged. There's also an automatic disconnector safety where the lever meets the lower tang, which is pretty much standard for modern lever-actions. We can all debate the need for a manual safety on a lever rifle, but the way I read the situation, one motivated tort lawyer swings more weight than 1000 mildly displeased consumers.

In some respects, the new Mossberg looks like a cross between a Marlin Model 336 and a late-model Winchester 94. The sliding round bolt resembles that of a Marlin, while the open-top receiver resembles that of a Winchester. Unlike the Winchester, however, the bolt is enclosed by two massive integral fore-and-aft rings that are forged in one piece with the receiver proper. The ejection port is similar to that of the Winchester Model 94 Angle Eject, and empties exit it with considerable force at nearly a perfect 45-degree angle, well clear of any scope you'd care to mount. The 464 weighs in at an advertised 6.7 lbs., a few ounces less than the walnut-stocked Model 336, with an overall length of 38.5 inches.

When you work the lever of the Model 464, the bottom of the receiver falls away to decrease the arc of the lever throw, which is short for a fairly long cartridge like the .30-30. Some may object to this “dropped-pants arrangement,” as gunwriter Henry Stebbins described it half a century ago, but it does eliminate the need for a lever lug on the bottom of the receiver. As a result, the flat bottom of the Model 464's receiver makes it easy to carry in one hand. This may seem like a minor point, but it's the kind of thing you'd notice while slogging your way back to camp in a freezing rain after spending sight hours in a deer blind with exactly one more long, hard mile to go.

So how's the Model 464 shoot? Not bad. Its action was smooth and slick — nothing wrong there. My only serious objection is its rear sight. It's a tiny sliding blade with an equally tiny set screw, much as you find on the older Henry .22 lever-actions.

The Model 464’s less-than-adequate sliding leaf rear sight.
The Model 464’s less-than-adequate sliding leaf rear sight.

As an old iron-sight man, I prefer the Marlin-style buckhorn with sliding ramp. At 50 yards, I simply could not lower the 464's rear sight enough to zero it at 50 yards, which is approximately the distance at which I took my last two Michigan deer. In fact, at 50 yards the gun shot a two-inch group that was dead on the bull but six inches high with Federal Power-Shok 170-grain softpoints. Faced with a situation like that, you can either wear yourself out cussing the rear sight, or you can just slap a scope on the thing.

I'm not enamored of scopes on lever guns, but I realize I'm in a distinct minority on that point. As for the front sight, it's a dovetailed, unhooded brass bead that shows up well enough in broad daylight. In the woods at twilight, it might be a different story — another potential reason to mount a scope.

On the Mossberg website, the company is running a poll that asks visitors what the next chambering for the Model 464 should be. I hope the Internet Police don't swoop down and arrest me, but I must confess that I voted multiple times. I'm not proud of it, but there it is. At first, I thought I'd like to see the gun in .444 Marlin, but then I changed my mind and thought how fun it would be to have a 464 chambered in .357 Magnum/.38 Special.

Then I contradicted myself again and voted for the .308 Marlin Express.

I consider Browning's BLR to be the Rolls-Royce of lever-actions. However, the MSRP of the Model 464 is only $493, with street price substantially less. So for five big bills you get the rifle, a swell Mossberg cable lock and a two-year limited warranty. That's pretty reasonable for a new gun, especially one that's so well-suited to the newbie hunter or the part-timer. I'd have been pleased as punch as find a Model 464 under the tree when I was just starting out.

Mossberg has also announced plans for a Model 464 chambered in .22 Long Rifle. This would fill the niche vacated by the late Winchester 9422 and would make an interesting understudy to the centerfire Model 464, which has plenty to recommend it in its own right.

Sotomayor: NRA’s Past President Strikes Again

0

Last week Gun Owners of America reported that NRA's Past President Sandy Froman was calling on all NRA members to vigorously oppose the nomination of Judge Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.

She did this in response to the “wait and see” approach that the NRA's upper management  has taken in regard to the Sotomayor nomination — an approach that may well allow her to wiggle through and be confirmed.

Yesterday, Sandy Froman struck again. But this time she was joined
with another past president of the NRA and several current Board
members, as well.

“Judge Sotomayor's record on the Second Amendment causes us grave
concern over her treatment of this enumerated right [to keep and
bear arms],” the coalition stated.

“As Second Amendment leaders deeply concerned about preserving all
fundamental rights for current and future generations of Americans,
we strongly oppose this nominee, and urge the Senate not to confirm
Judge Sotomayor.”

In related news, the NRA sent a letter yesterday to the Senate
Judiciary committee expressing “very serious concerns” over the
Sotomayor nomination, but said that the leadership “has not
announced an official position” out of respect for the confirmation
process. The letter indicated the NRA's management would be
watching the upcoming hearings very carefully.

One of the concerns about the hearing process, however, is that
Sotomayor will act exactly the same way Obama has. You will remember
that Obama tried to play himself off as a supporter of gun rights
during the presidential campaign, but then once he took office, began
showing his true colors.

Obama has nominated far-left gun banners to key positions of power —
including Attorney General Eric Holder, State Department counsel
Harold Koh and Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

It's not uncommon to see politicians tout the Bill of Rights when
trying to get elected or confirmed, but then act like a modern day
Benedict Arnold once they are safely entrenched.

If Judge Sotomayor is anything like the man who nominated her, she
will tell Senators what they want to hear during the Senate
proceedings, but then stab us in the back once she has secured a
lifetime appointment to the bench.

Folks, this is a huge battle. And that's why it's important to
have every single gun organization firing all of its political
ammunition. This is a battle that we can win. So even though we
already asked you to contact the NRA's management last week, it is
imperative that they hear from you again.

ACTION: Please urge the NRA's upper management to tell Senators
that a vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor is an anti-gun vote. You
can use the text message below — addressed to NRA Executive Vice
President Wayne LaPierre and NRA Executive Director Chris Cox —
to help direct your comments to the NRA.

CONTACT INFO for the NRA:

Phone (800) 392-8683
Webform https://secure.nraila.org/Contact.aspx

—– Pre-written comments —–

Dear Mr. LaPierre and Mr. Cox:

I was so excited to see that past NRA President Sandy Froman — in
coalition with several other past and present NRA leaders — came
out in opposition the nomination of Judge Sotomayor.

In a letter dated July 7, the coalition stated that “we strongly
oppose this nominee, and urge the Senate not to confirm Judge
Sotomayor.”

This is Froman's second communication in this regard, as she stepped
up to the plate on June 24 with a call to arms for all NRA members
to vigorously oppose the Sotomayor nomination.

“Gun owners, and especially the members of the National Rifle
Association,” Froman said, “must aggressively oppose Judge
Sotomayor's confirmation to the Supreme Court.”

I couldn't agree more with Mrs. Froman.

I hope that the NRA will officially tell Senators now — and not wait
until after the hearings — that a vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor
is an anti-gun vote. Please let me know what you intend to do.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Source: gunowners.org

Gun Digest Gun Rights Forum »

Anti Gun-Show Bill in US Senate

0

Senate Bill 843, sponsored by a number of well known gun control advocates, attempts to achieve its goals by dismantling the accessibility and responsible execution of gun shows all together.

As one can only expect, much of the bill goes too far in restricting the lawful promotion of any show. Similar to Amendment 22 here in Colorado, the bill will require background checks on individuals who purchase or transfer a firearm at a show. But the bill goes further, seemingly in design to disrupt the entire process of attending or organizing a show.

Among the requirements outlined in the bill is the mandatory registration of all gun show promoters, and vendors.

A vendor is identified in the bill in the following way: “The term ‘gun show vendor’ means any person who exhibits, sells, offers for sale, transfers, or exchanges one or more firearms at the gun show, regardless of whether or not that person arranges with the gun show promoter for a fixed location from which to exhibit, sell, offer for sale, transfer or exchange one or more firearms.” Essentially, if you attend the gun show, with a firearm of your own, you are viewed as a vendor and will be required to sign a ledger, and submit your valid ID for registration.

As pointed out by “the Firearms Coalition of Colorado,” this is basically de facto gun owner registration. Read more

Source: Jefferson County Conservative Examiner

ATF Won’t Say If They Have Warrants

0

Dewey Webb, special agent in charge of ATF’s Houston Field Division, told CNSNews.com that ATF agents are visiting homes in the Houston area in connection with weapons that have been identified as being used by the drug cartels in Mexico.

“Under ATF’s Project Gunrunner program and the Gun Runner Impact Teams or GRIT, ATF has identified several weapons of choice used by the drug trafficking organizations to outfit their criminal enterprises in Mexico,” Webb told CNSNews.com.

Webb explained how the program works saying that weapons that are traced back to certain U.S. purchasers trigger leads for agents to check out.

“When a firearm is recovered that has been used in a crime in Mexico, ATF through its eTrace system can often trace that weapon back to its original purchaser,” Webb told CNSNews.com.

“ATF agents, vigilant yet ever respectful of the rights of law abiding gun owner, will then initiate contact with those original purchasers,” he added. “Those contacts generally lead to either confirmation of a legitimate purchase or could reveal additional indicators that may suggest a firearm trafficking scheme.” Read more

Source: CNSnews.com

Gun Digest Gun Rights Forum »

Mauser Pricing and Reference

0

Mauser Pricing & ReferenceAre You in the Market for a Mauser?

Know what your Mauser firearms are worth with this up-to-date PDF download from the Standard Catalog of Firearms.

* Completely updated pricing for Mauser firearms with new entries and photos
* Value Trackers: Real-life auction results
* Sleeper Alerts: Collectible guns that are outpacing the market
* Links to manufacturers’ website

Download gun values now

Learn pricing and values for these Mauser firearms:

Mauser Early Sporting Rifle – Type A Short Action
Mauser Early Sporting Rifle – Type B Medium Action
Mauser Early Sporting Rifle – Type A Long Action
Mauser Model 1896 “Broomhandle Mauser Pistol”
Mauser System Mauser 10-Shot Core Hammer
Mauser Six-Shot Standard Cone Hammer
Mauser Twenty-Shot Cone Hammer
Mauser Standard Cone Hammer
Mauser Fixed Sight Cone Hammer
Mauser Turkish Contract Cone Hammer
Mauser Early Transitional Large Ring Hammer
Mauser Model 1899 Flat Side – Italian Contract
Mauser Early Flat Side
Mauser Late Flat Side
Mauser Early Large Ring Hammer Bolo
Mauser Shallow-Milled Panel Model
Mauser Deep-Milled Panel Model
Mauser Late Large Ring Hammer Bolo
Mauser Six-Shot Large Ring Bolo
Mauser Early Small Ring Hammer Model, Transitional
Mauser Early Small Ring Hammer Bolo Model
Mauser Six-Shot Small Ring Hammer Model
Mauser Standard Pre-war Commercial
Mauser 9mm Export Model
Mauser Banner Model
Mauser Persian Contract
Mauser Standard Wartime Commercial
Mauser 9mm Parabellum Military Contract
Mauser 1920 Rework
Mauser Luger Barreled 190 Rework
Mauser Early Post-war Bolo Model
Mauser Late Post-war Bolo Model
Mauser French Gendarme Model
Mauser Early Model 1930
Mauser Late Model 1930
Mauser Model 1930 Removeable Magazine
Mauser Cone Hammer Flat Side Carbine
Mauser Large Ring Hammer Transitional Carbine
Mauser Large Ring Hammer Flatside Carbine
Mauser Small Ring Hammer Carbine
Mauser Chinese Marked, Handmade Copies
Mauser Taku-Naval Dockyard Model
Mauser Shansei Arsenal Model
Mauser Model 1910 Pocket Pistol
Mauser Model 1914 Pocket Pistol
Mauser Model 1912/12 Pocket Pistol
Mauser Model WTP I
Mauser Model WTP II
Mauser Model 1934
Mauser Model HSC
Mauser Low Grip Screw Model Pocket Pistol
Mauser Early Commercial Model Pocket Pistol
Mauser Transition Model Pocket Pistol
Mauser Late Nazi Army Model Pistol
Mauser Early Nazi Navy Model Pocket Pistol
Mauser Wartime Nazi Navy Model Pocket Pistol
Mauser Early Nazi Police Model
Mauser Wartime Nazi Police Model
Mauser Wartime Commercial Model
Mauser French Manufactured Model
Mauser Model HSc Post-war Production
Mauser Gamba Production
Mauser Model 2000
Mauser Model 3000
Mauser Model 3000 Magnum
Mauser Model 4000
Mauser Model 225
Mauser Model ES340
Mauser Model DSM34
Mauser Model MS420B
Mauser Model ES350
Mauser Model M410
Mauser Model M420
Mauser Model EN310
Mauser Model EL320
Mauser Model KKW
Mauser Model MS350B
Mauser Model ES350B
Mauser Model ES340B
Mauser Model MM41OBN
Mauser Model MS420B
Mauser Model 107
Mauser Model 201 Standard
Mauser Model 201 Luxus
Mauser Model 66 Standard
Mauser Model 66 Magnum
Mauser Model 66 Safari
Mauser Model 66 Stuzen
Mauser IDF Model 66SP
Mauser Model 77
Mauser Model 77 Ultra
Mauser Model 77 Mannlicher
Mauser Model 77 Big Game
Mauser Model 86 SR
Mauser Model 93 SR
Mauser Model 96
Mauser Model 98 (SIG Arms)
Mauser Model 99 Standard
Mauser Model 99 Magnum
Mauser Model 80 SA
Mauser Model Compact DA
Mauser Model 90 DA
Mauser Model M2 (Imported by SIGARMS)

Merkel Pricing and Reference

0

Download Merkel Pricing and Reference

Are You in the Market for a Merkel?

Know what your Merkel firearms are worth with this up-to-date 12-page .PDF download from the Standard Catalog of Firearms.

* Completely updated pricing for Merkel firearms with new entries and photos
* Value Trackers: Real-life auction results
* Sleeper Alerts: Collectible guns that are outpacing the market
* Links to manufacturers’ website

Download gun values now

Learn prices and values for these Merkel firearms:

Merkel Model 8
Merkel Model 117/117E
Merkel Model 118/118E
Merkel Model 124/125
Merkel Model 124
Merkel Model 125
Merkel Model 130
Merkel Model 126
Merkel Model 170
Merkel Model 127
Merkel Model 47E
Merkel Model 147
Merkel Model 147E
Merkel Model 147EL
Merkel Model 122
Merkel Model 47SL
Merkel Model 147SL
Merkel Model 147SSL
Merkel Model 247S/347S
Merkel Model 247S
Merkel Model 347S
Merkel Model 447SL
Merkel Model 280
Merkel Model 280 EL
Merkel Model 280SL
Merkel Model 360
Merkel Model 360EL
Merkel Model 360SL
Merkel Model 280/360 Two Barrel Set
Merkel Model 280/360EL Two Barrel Set
Merkel Model 280/360SL Two Barrel Set
Merkel Model 1620
Merkel Model 1620E
Merkel Model 1620EL
Merkel Model 1620SL
Merkel Model 1622
Merkel Model 1622E
Merkel Model 1622EL
Merkel Model 102E
Merkel Model 102E
Merkel Model 103E
Merkel Model 204E
Merkel Model 301E
Merkel Model 302E
Merkel Model 303 Luxus
Merkel Model 304E
Merkel Model 400E
Merkel Model 401E
Merkel Model 200E
Merkel Model 201E
Merkel Model 202E
Merkel Model 200ES
Merkel Model 200ET
Merkel Model 200SC (Sporting Clays)
Merkel Model 201ES
Merkel Model 201ET
Merkel Model 203E
Merkel Model 303E
Merkel Model 303EL
Merkel Model 2000EL
Merkel Model 2000EL Sporter
Merkel Model 2000CL
Merkel Model 2000CL Sporter
Merkel Model 2001EL
Merkel Model 2001EL Sporter
Merkel Model 2002EL
Merkel Model 2016EL
Merkel Model 2016EL Two Barrel Set
Merkel Model 2116EL
Merkel Model 2116EL Two Barrel Set
Merkel Model 410E
Merkel Model 411E
Merkel Model 300
Merkel Model 311E
Merkel Model 312E
Merkel Model 313E
Merkel Model 314E
Merkel Model 180
Merkel Model 183
Merkel Model 190
Merkel Model 132E
Merkel Model 140-1
Merkel Model 140-1.1
Merkel Model 140-2
Merkel Model 140-2.1
Merkel Model 150-1
Merkel Model 150-1.1
Merkel Model 160S Luxus Double Rifle
Merkel Model 160S-2.1
Merkel Model 211E Rifle/Shotgun Combination
Merkel Model 210E Rifle/Shotgun
Merkel Model 211E Rifle/Shotgun
Merkel Model 213E Rifle/Shotgun
Merkel Model 313E Rifle Rifle/Shotgun Combination
Merkel Model 220E Over-and-Under Double Rifle
Merkel Model 221E Over-and-Under Double Rifle
Merkel Model 223E Over-and-Under Double Rifle
Merkel Model 240-1
Merkel Model 240-1.1
Merkel Model 323E Over-and-Under Double Rifle
Merkel Model 95K Drilling
Merkel Model 96K
Merkel Model 96K-Engraved
Merkel Model K-1 Jagd
Merkel KR-1 Premium
Merkel KR-1 Weimar

Colt No Longer Exclusive Owner of M4 Rifle

0

The month of July marked a significant change in the business world of military firearms, when the U.S. Army took control of the design rights to the M4 carbine. Those rights had belonged exclusively to Colt Defense LLC for the last 15 years.

What might that transfer of rights mean? According to Army Times, “With an uncertain budget looming, the service is free to give other gun companies a crack at a carbine contract….In late November [2008], Army senior leadership announced the service’s intent to open a competition for a new carbine this fall in preparation for the June 30 expiration date of Colt’s hold on the M4 licensing agreement. The Army is slated to finish fielding the last of its 473,000 M4 requirement some time next year.”

“We probably won’t do anything with it right now,” said Colonel Doug Tamilio, project manager for the Army’s Soldier Weapons program. “We have what we need. The good news is we will own it now; that gives us the flexibility to do what we need it to do.”

Officials at Colt LLC could not be reached for comment. But other gun makers were glad to weigh in over the change.

“Now that the sole-source era is over, we hope to see free and open competition of any interim or long-term solution for the service rifle or carbine for the American soldier,” Jason Schauble, vice president of the military products division of Remington, told Army Times. “Now there is a chance to get something better in the hands of the soldier. Why not do it? If Colt wins again, God bless them.”

Gun Rights Advocates Join to Oppose Sotomayer

0

From Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

BELLEVUE, WA – Several of the nation’s leading gun rights activists, including the heads of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and Second Amendment Foundation, today joined to oppose the confirmation of Judge Sonia Sotomayor as an associate justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.

“ It is extremely important that a Supreme Court justice understand and appreciate the origin and meaning of the Second Amendment, a constitutional guarantee permanently enshrined in the Bill of Rights, ” said a letter from the group, which was hand-delivered to every member of the U.S. Senate. “Judge Sotomayor’s record on the Second Amendment causes us grave concern about her treatment of this enumerated Constitutional right.”

Included among the signators were Sandra S. Froman, former president of the National Rifle Association; Alan M. Gottlieb, CCRKBA chairman; Joseph Tartaro, SAF president; Gene Hoffman, chairman of the CalGUNS Foundation; several current or former NRA directors; Robert Corbin, former Arizona attorney general and past NRA president; former Congressman Bob Barr; Jim Wallace, executive director of the Gun Owners’ Action League in Massachusetts; John T. lee, president of the Pennsylvania Rifle and Pistol Association; Tom King, president of the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association; Robert E. Sanders, former assistant director of law enforcement for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and several others, 25 in all.

“The Supreme Court is almost certain to decide next year whether the Second Amendment applies to states and local governments, as it does to the federal government,” they wrote. “While on the Second Circuit, Judge Sotomayor revealed her views on the right to keep and bear arms in Maloney v. Cuomo, a case decided after Heller, yet holding that the Second Amendment is not a fundamental right, that it does not apply to the states, and that if an object is “designed primarily as a weapon” that is a sufficient basis for total prohibition even within the home. Earlier in a 2004 case, United States v. Sanchez-Villar, Sotomayor and two colleagues perfunctorily dismissed a Second Amendment claim holding that “the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.” Imagine if such a view were expressed about other fundamental rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, such as the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments.”

“We joined in this effort,” Gottlieb said, “because our nation stands at point in history where we either defend all civil rights, or begin to surrender them one by one until none are left. It would be unconscionable to stand silently as the Senate deliberates confirmation of a new associate justice with such evident disregard for a key tenet, if not the critical element, of the Bill of Rights.”

“The Second Amendment survives today by a single vote in the Supreme Court,” the letter notes. “Judge Sotomayor has already revealed her views on the right to keep and bear arms and we believe they are contrary to the intent and purposes of the Second Amendment and Bill of Rights.”

MUST READ ARTICLES