6.8 SPC VS 6.5 Grendel: Intermediate Cartridge Rumble

6.8 SPC VS 6.5 Grendel: Intermediate Cartridge Rumble
At first glance, the 6.5 (right) and the 6.8 (left) are similar in performance. But the 6.5 can use bullets with much better BCs, and that makes the difference downrange.

When it comes to the SPC and the Grendel, the better intermediate cartridge all depends on your aims.

For most, the .223 Remington/5.56 NATO is enough to get the job done in an AR-15. Hey, it fits the bill for the U.S. military for going on 60 years now, so there is proof in the pudding. However, more than one marksman—military and civilian—has yearned for a bit more oomph per trigger pull.

This was especially true in the early years of this century when in-the-field performance issues with the 5.56 reared their ugly heads. The less-than-desirable results in the hands of our fighting men and women got the innovation wheels turning in search of a solution. The answer: a true-to-form intermediate cartridge, something along the lines of the storied Soviet 7.62×39mm. Medicine that put bad guys down and kept them there.

The 6.5 Grendel is the brainchild of Bill Alexander, and he makes cracking good rifles chambered in it. That doesn’t mean you can’t make your own rifle, and eventually you will. Trust me on this one.
The 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC hit the scene within a year of each other, true intermediate cartridges for the AR-15.

This answer came in two cartridges—the 6.8 SPC and 6.5 Grendel. While not enough to de-throne the small-bore king as head of the military, the metric marvels vastly improved the potential of AR-style rifles with minimal disruption to the rifle’s design. Not a bad combination, one that earned each a dedicated following. That morphed into the mythologies of the hard-hitting 6.8 and the long-flying 6.5.

For many, the 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel debate seems cut and dry. Except, it’s not quite. Truth be told, there’s a bit of nuance to the conversation.

Quick Info

  • Both cartridges developed as improvements over 5.56 NATO.
  • 6.8 SPC developed by Remington and U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit.
  • 6.5 Grendel created by Bill Alexander and Janne Pohjoispää.
  • Similar case capacities lead to comparable velocities when loaded with like bullet weights.
  • 6.5 Grendel better at longer ranges thanks to higher BC bullets.
  • Larger bullet diameter and nose cross section generally give the 6.8 SPC better terminal performance.
  • 6.8 SPC performs well out of shorter-bareled rifles and AR-pistols, while the 6.5 Grendel produces better results out of longer-barrel guns.
  • Wider range of ammunition options for 6.5 Grendel, including match ammunition, while 6.8 SPC offers mainly hunting options.
6.8 SPC6.5 Grendel
Parent Case.30 Remington.220 Russian
Bullet Diameter.277 in.264 in
Neck Diameter.306 in.293 in
Shoulder Diameter.402 in.428 in
Base Diameter.422 in.439 in
Rim Diameter.422 in.440 in
Case Length1.687 in1.520 in
COL2.260 in2.260 in
Case Capacity34.8–36.9 gr H2O35.0 gr H2O
Maximum Pressure (SAAMI)55,000 psi52,000 psi

6.8 SPC Pros & Cons


  • Offers somewhat better terminal ballistics do to larger caliber and nose cross section.
  • Designed for the M4, thus performs well in carbine-length rifles.
  • Loyal user base, particularly among hog hunters.


  • Falls short compared to the 6.5 Grendel in terms of long-range capabilities.
  • Target shooting and match ammunition options are limited.

6.5 Grendel Pros And Cons


  • Diverse range of ammunition options, including hunting, target, and match.
  • Longer and sleeker bullets result in better long-range performance.
  • Officially adopted by the Serbian Army, adding legitimacy to its design.


  • Cartridge performs better out of longer-barreled rifles, thus making it less nimble.

Shared History

As mentioned, both cartridges were attempts to improve on the 5.56 NATO, in particular the small-bore's terminal ballistics. The simplest path was to step up the caliber.

In 2004, the 6.8 SPC hit the scene. A multi-year project between Remington Arms and the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit to develop a more potent intermediate option, the cartridge had some early snags (more on that in a moment). Through testing, the 6.8mm caliber became the choice since it proved as accurate as the 6.5 cartridges at medium range, but offered improved terminal performance, somewhat akin to the 7mm. Remington turned to the defunct .30 Remington—essentially a rimless .30-30 Winchester—for the parent case since it provided ample capacity with a marginally larger case head (.422 inch). While it required a bolt upgrade and dedicated magazines, the slightly larger head size theoretically didn’t inject structural integrity issues.

As to the aforementioned snags, what Remington delivered to the military wasn’t up to snuff—not the cartridge, but the chamber design. Too little lead (.050 inch) led to pressure issues. “Big Green” remedied this with downloaded ammo, but that hurt the cartridge’s performance. Thankfully, the chamber issue has since been addressed, the lead extended to .100 inch in what is known as the 6.8 SPC II. Most modern rifles chambered for the cartridge are of this ilk and say as much on the barrel. Officially, however, the original 6.8 SPC design is still what’s on file with the Shooting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI).

The 6.5 Grendel was introduced in 2003 through the efforts of Bill Alexander (of Alexander Arms) and Janne Pohjoispää. In designing an intermediate cartridge they turned to a logical parent case for the job—the legendary 7.62x39mm (with a nod to its PPC progeny). The Grendel, too, requires a new bolt to accommodate its larger case head (.445) as well as dedicated magazines.

While its designers had military aspirations for the Grendel, it mainly remained a target-shooting and hunting option—at least stateside. In more recent times and in other parts of the world this has changed. In 2016, the Serbian Army become the first military force to officially adopt the cartridge, adding legitimacy to the design.

Learn More About The 6.8 SPC And 6.5 Grendel:


There is a lot of hubbub when it comes to debating 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel ballistics. In most people’s minds, the SPC (Special Purpose Cartridge) is a true intermediate cartridge, while the Grendel flirts with long-range capabilities. However, the cartridges’ external ballistics track much closer than most folks expect.

Much of this is due to nearly identical case capacities. Depending on the brass in question, both hold right around 35 grains of water. Essentially, this means that loaded with the same powder, with the same bullet weight, out of barrels of equal length, both cartridges will produce similar velocities. The difference comes in ballistic coefficients (BC), given at the same weight a 6.5 bullet will be longer, thus boasting a higher BC. Simply put, it will buck air resistance and wind drift more efficiently. But crunch the numbers and you’ll find the Grendel’s downrange advantage takes time to manifest.

I've put together an example to illustrate, testing two handloads: 6.8 SPC with a 120-grain Hornady SST bullet and 6.5 Grendel with a 123-grain Hornady SST bullet, both pushed by Ramshot X-Terminator powder for maximum velocity out of 20-inch barrels. The .510 BC (G1 model) Grendel bullet launches at an average 2,344 fps and the SPC’s .400 BC bullet at an average 2,457. Out to 500 yards with a 100-yard zero, the loads track nearly identical trajectories. It's only after this point that the Grendel performs better, dropping 6-inches less at 700 yards and 10-inches less at 800 yards. Additionally, while the 6.8 goes sub-sonic—thus losing optimal ballistic performance—just past 800 yards, the 6.5 stays supersonic out to nearly 1,000 yards.

6.5 v 6.8 graph

Next, we’ll put those rounds in much more common configurations for each caliber—a 20-inch barreled Grendel and a 16-inch barreled SPC. In addition to the higher BC, the extra bore in the Grendel gives the rifle/cartridge combination a 120 fps advantage over the SPC. This adds up past the 300-yard mark. Again on a 100-yard zero, at 500 yards the Grendel has fallen 10-inches less than the SPC and at 600 yards 16-inches less. That’s substantial for anyone concerned about flatter trajectories or reaching out.

6.8 v 6.5 graph

There are arguments the 6.8 SPC has a superior terminal profile, doing more damage once at its target. Military testing has turned up the 6.8 (or .270 if you will) does tend to produce more devastating wounding patterns. Much of this is attributable to the caliber’s larger diameter, plus a greater cross-section at the nose that more efficiently initiates bullet expansion. Though, hit a whitetail in the vitals at a reasonable hunting range with either 6.8 SPC or 6.5 Grendel, chances are the deer won’t know the difference.


If the 6.5 Grendel allows a longer effective range than the 6.8, it seems it should be the natural choice for most shooters. I’ve foreshadowed why there’s a place for both cartridges in modern shooting, however. Get behind most 6.8 SPC guns and you'll drive a more nimble platform.

As mentioned, carbine-length rifles (16-inch barrels and down) are the norm for the 6.8, which makes sense given who the cartridge appeals to. Hog hunters have buoyed the SPC thanks to its excellent intermediate performance and agility of its platforms. In places such as Texas and Oklahoma, the management of these critters is a target-rich endeavor that calls for a hard-hitting and deft gun/cartridge combination. Furthermore, the 6.8 SPC has found a place in short-barreled rifles and AR-pistols, a very potent defensive option that excels in close-quarters engagements.

The 6.8 SPC II isn't afraid of going small. An example, Wilson Combat's SBR Tactical.
The 6.8 SPC isn't afraid of going small. An example, Wilson Combat's SBR Tactical.

This isn’t to say the 6.5 Grendel isn’t available as a carbine. Heck, Palmetto State Armory has a 12-inch Grendel pistol, for those interested. However, given most folks’ desire to take advantage of the cartridge's ballistic capabilities, 20-inch-plus barrels dominate. Even Bill Alexander recommends this length for Grendel rifles aimed at hunting. Certainly, with practice, shooters can become quick in transitioning targets with a longer-barreled gun, but overall it is more challenging.


In ammo squeezes, you take what you can get. In fatter times, both cartridges are fairly abundant, though there is some difference in what’s stocked on virtual and brick-and-mortar shelves.

Hunting ammunition, topped with soft-point or polymer-tipped bullets, dominates the 6.8 SPC selection. This makes sense since hunters have kept the cartridge afloat. Away from this arena, I've found little more than affordable range ammo with FMJ bullets.

Federal 6.5 Grendel
Helping the 6.5 Grendel go long is an ample selection of factory-loaded match ammunition.

Given it has a more dedicated following of target shooters and technically has the chops to reach out 1,000 yards in skilled hands, the 6.5 Grendel has a wider ammo selection. In addition to hunting and range ammo, manufacturers also turn out legitimate match options. For instance, Federal Premium’s Gold Medal Grendel ammo boasts a 130-grain Berger AR Hybrid OTM bullet—a modern low-drag projectile designed to maximize range. And I'll attest, the load is fit for reaching out.

Bullet weights for both cartridges, the 6.8 SPC ranging from 85-grains to 140-grains and the 6.5 Grendel 85-grains to 130-grains.

Who Fits Whom?

So, when everything shakes out in the 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel conversation, which cartridge is the best fit for which shooter? It’s a difficult question to answer. Given, when everything is equal, the cartridges have similar performance. But they’re still not identical.

Since the 6.8 SPC is generally found and performs well out of carbine- and pistol-length guns, the cartridge excels at tasks that require agility in the 300-yard neighborhood. From my experience, the cartridge is excellent at thinning a sounder of hogs, but is more than adept for pieing a corner to confront a bump in the night. On the flip side, the 6.5 Grendel gives you the ability to stretch your rifle’s legs or hunt in open country. I've come to accept you have to pack more rifle, but the effort pays off with a selection of higher BC bullets and the ability to operate out to 800 yards.

Compared to other cartridge comparisons, the differences are slimmer in the 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel debate. That said, at the margins, each provides an advantage to a particular shooter. You just have to puzzle out what shooter you happen to be.


Next Step: Get your FREE Printable Target Pack

Enhance your shooting precision with our 62 MOA Targets, perfect for rifles and handguns. Crafted in collaboration with Storm Tactical for accuracy and versatility.

Subscribe to the Gun Digest email newsletter and get your downloadable target pack sent straight to your inbox. Stay updated with the latest firearms info in the industry.

Previous article Reloading .223 Remington: Four Great Loads
Next article 9 Best Concealed Carry Revolvers For Personal Defense (2024)
Elwood Shelton is the Digital Editor for Gun Digest. He lives in Colorado and has provided coverage on a vast spectrum of topics for GD for more than a decade. Before that, he was an award-winning sports and outdoors reporter for a number of newspapers across the Rocky Mountains. His experience has consisted of covering the spread of chronic wasting disease into the Western Slope of Colorado to the state’s ranching for wildlife programs. His passion for shooting began at a young age, fostered on pheasant hunts with his father. Since then, he has become an accomplished handloader, long-range shooter and avid hunter—particularly mule deer and any low-down, dirty varmint that comes into his crosshairs. He is a regular contributor to Gun Digest Magazine and has contributed to various books on guns and shooting, most recently Lever-Actions: A Tribute to the All-American Rifle.


  1. I shoot both calibars and both are excellent on game and long range matches, both are easy to reload, i personley like 117 grain for the SPC, and 129 grain for the 6.5 Grendel out of 18 inch barrel.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.