Home Blog Page 389

You, Me and the CMP

1

The CMP program offers civilian shooters access to U.S. Government surplus arms at great prices.

They wrote legislation that established the Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety. This non-profit federally chartered corporation was given the responsibility for the supervision, oversight, and control of the U.S. Civilian Marksmanship Program. The law forming this corporation mandates that the mission of the CMP is the “Instruction of the citizens of the United States in marksmanship&.” with the highest priority going to training juniors. The CMP supplies firearms safety and marksmanship training through a nationwide network of affiliated shooting clubs, state shooting associations, and other organizations such as the Boy Scouts and school shooting teams.

The official United States government-sponsored Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) is known to only a small fraction of American gun owners, even though it is of incredibly high importance to our country and the future of firearms use in general — for ourselves and our descendants.

Author's service-grade M-1, shown here with a WWII ammo belt, a clip of ball ammo and a clip of black-tipped armor piercing (AP) ammo.

Author's service-grade M-1, shown here with a WWII ammo belt, a clip of ball ammo and a clip of black-tipped armor piercing (AP) ammo.

My family has a long history with the Civilian Marksmanship Program, going back over 70 years. Indeed, I personally owe a great deal of who and what I am to my participation in various CMP programs since I was a young lad. I still own an M1917 30-06 rifle and a Colt M-1917 45 ACP revolver that my late father purchased in the early 1930s from the CMP's predecessor — the Director of Civilian Marksmanship (DCM).

Did you know that gun clubs affiliated with the CMP can qualify to do the same at even better prices, and get substantial other support from the CMP? Even better, the proceeds of the sale of all these items goes to fund the operation of the CMP and its many programs.

For the last 100 years the Civilian Marksmanship Program has trained millions of American youths and adults to shoot in a safe and proper manner. In addition, the CMP sustains the operation of the U.S. National Rifle and Pistol Matches, supports the marksmanship programs of all the state shooting associations, and has made sure that our country always has a substantial number of our population who know how to shoot well. My own extensive experience in the military bears out the significance and importance of my personal CMP background and training.

The CMP program can trace its roots clear back to 1903, when Congress first passed legislation to establish the formation of the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice (NBPRP). This legislation was passed with the full support of President Theodore Roosevelt and the National Rifle Association (NRA). At the same time it also established the U.S. National Rifle and Pistol Matches, as well as appropriations to transport teams of marksmen from the various branches of the U.S. military to attend the National Matches. The main objective of these laws was to promote better rifle marksmanship in our armed forces.

In 1905 Congress passed further legislation, again with the strong support of President Roosevelt and the NRA, that authorized the sale (at cost) of surplus military rifles, ammunition, and other military equipment to civilian shooting clubs meeting requirements laid down by the NBPRP. This was the beginning of a century-old U.S. government-sponsored national program that continues to this day to supply obsolete military rifles to qualified civilians for the purpose of promoting and developing marksmanship in the civilian population. Right from the beginning, the primary objective has been to build and maintain a reserve of trained marksmen among the civilian population that could be called upon for military service in time of war, either as soldiers or marksmanship instructors.

In the summer of 1916, with Europe already at war, Congress passed the National Defense Act. That law earmarked money specifically to promote civilian marksmanship training and authorized the distribution of appropriate arms and ammunition to organized civilian shooting clubs for the same purpose. In addition, it set aside funding for the operation of military rifle ranges and the transportation of military shooting instructors to assist civilian clubs in marksmanship training and allowed civilian shooters access to most military rifle ranges. In addition, it created the office of the Director of Civilian Marksmanship (DCM) to oversee these activities. Finally, it authorized funds to transport civilian teams from across the country to the National Matches to compete with the standard military rifles and pistols of the day. Much to the embarrassment of the military teams, in 1916, in the first of the National Matches open to civilians, both the individual national service rifle and pistol champions were civilians.

The aftermath of World War I found the U.S. military awash with a huge surplus of military rifles and handguns. These included 280,000 Russian M91 7.625x4Rmm Mosin-Nagant rifles originally made by Remington and New England Westinghouse for the Russian government. These had been rendered undeliverable by the Russian revolution so the U.S. government purchased them from their manufacturers, ostensibly for training purposes, but more likely to help the manufacturers out of a financial bind since they were already doing substantial work on other important U.S. government contracts. I cannot find any record that the M91 Mosins were ever actually used for training purposes. However, some of these M91 Mosin rifles were issued to — and carried by — U.S. troops assigned to the international expeditions to Russia to protect Allied interests from the Bolshevik revolution, during and shortly after WWI.

Also on hand were 20,000 Canadian Ross Mark II 303 straight-pull rifles procured from Canada during WWI, ostensibly for use as training rifles. In addition, there were over 100,000 obsolete U.S. Krag 30-40 rifles and carbines, thousands of old 45-70 Springfield “Trapdoor” carbines and rifles, over 200,000 M-1917 S&W and Colt 45 ACP revolvers, and a couple million M-1917 “Enfield” 30-06 rifles. There were also large quantities of M-1903 30-06 rifles and M-1911 45 ACP pistols that were, during the post WWI period, the standard service arms of the U.S. armed services.

For more information about the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP), Click Here


Order Gun Digest 2008 at 60% OFF!If you like this article, you'll love the book it appeared in — Gun Digest 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

Public Against Seattle Gun Ban

0

While Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels appears to have lost sight of the fact that gun owners have rights, including the right to use public property, the citizens have not. I wrote about that here.

According to Bob Scales, senior policy analyst for the city’s Office of Policy and Management, in addition to the 1,088 comments submitted via e-mail to the city during a comment period that ended Sunday (Oct. 4), there were also ten telephone calls received by the Customer Service Bureau. Nine of those were against the idea and one supported the proposed ban.

Out of 1,098 comments, including the ten telephone calls, only 44 people supported the gun ban idea.
 

With results like that, what’s a lame-duck mayor to do?

Well, in the case of Greg Nickels, he hands off responsibility for adopting the ban rule to the director of Parks and Recreation. This is the end result of more than a year of posturing by the mayor, who had wanted to lobby the Legislature in January to erode this state’s long-standing preemption law, essentially allowing cities – or at least Seattle – to adopt their own firearms regulations.

Nickels apparently did not do his homework on that one very well, because if he had, he would have realized that the Legislature passed preemption in 1983 to prevent that kind of thing. Prior to that, the state had kind of a checkerboard of gun regulations, so that something which might be perfectly legal in Yakima would be illegal in Tacoma. Washington’s preemption statute works so well that it has served as a model for similar laws in other states.  

(Nickels) apparently thinks he is being clever by having a surrogate sign an order to post city parks off limits to firearms. If that is the case, the chicken has, indeed, come home to roost.” – Alan Gottlieb, Second Amendment Foundation

Upon learning that Nickels would not be signing an executive order banning guns, as he had originally threatened in June 2008, Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation said it was “chicken.” He issued a critical statement about Nickels and the public comment data on Thursday.

The data provided by Scales is revealing, showing once again how out of touch with his own constituents the mayor has become.

Only 8 percent of Seattle residents who commented on the proposed ban support it. Read more

Source: Seattle Gun Rights Examiner

Streamlight Warns of Risk of Using Off-Brand Batteries

0

Streamlight warns against using off-brand batteriesStreamlight, Inc., a leading provider of high-performance flashlights for industrial, fire and rescue, law enforcement professionals and sporting enthusiasts, today issued another warning about purchasing and using inferior quality lithium 123A batteries with its flashlight products or other products.  Use of off-brand lithium batteries may present a risk of leakage, fire, explosion or serious personal injury, company officials said.

“Streamlight recommends only the use of U.S. made, high quality lithium batteries with its products, including Streamlight Battery No. CR123A,  Panasonic Battery No. CR123A or Duracell Battery No. 123,” said Ray Sharrah, Streamlight’s Chief Operating Officer.  “The use of other batteries, or the mixing of used and new or different brand batteries, could result in fire, explosion or burn hazards.”

Sharrah said that a Houston police officer suffered minor injuries on October 4 when a Streamlight flashlight he was using during an investigation reportedly exploded while in use.  The flashlight was powered by off-brand Chinese batteries, which were the source of the explosion.

“Streamlight lithium CR123A batteries are manufactured to stringent quality control standards, incorporating safety features which ensure they will not overheat in our high-performance flashlights,” explained Sharrah. “By using quality U.S. made lithium battery brands exclusively, Streamlight product users can be assured that they can operate their flashlight products safely at all times.”  He added that users should never misuse, short circuit, improperly store or discard, disassemble or heat any CR123 batteries above 212 F (100 C).

Streamlight includes a warning about using off-brand batteries on applicable product packages and instructions.  Information is also available on the company’s website at https://www.streamlight.com/education/lithium.aspx.

More Senators Push Supreme Court to Rule Against Chicago Handgun Ban

0

Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) are joining Rep. Mark Souder (R-Ind.) in filing a joint amicus brief before the Supreme Court — repeating an effort they first made last year in the District of Columbia’s gun-rights case.

The lawmakers say they plan to ask justices to apply the Second Amendment more forcibly to states, siding with the National Rifle Association in seeking to overturn the city of Chicago’s handgun registration laws.

The Supreme Court last year already struck down the D.C. gun ban by rullng that the Second Amendment guaranteed a fundamental right to keep and bear arms. The Court last week agreed to hear the Chicago case during its fall term.

“With its landmark decision in D.C. v. Heller, the Supreme Court affirmed an individual’s right to bear arms is a fundamental, Constitutionally-guaranteed liberty,” said Hutchison. Read more

Source: the hill.com

 

Open Carry Making Headway

0

This is the same municipal league who fought hard against the concealed carry law, so naturally I thought the worst. I just assumed they'd found a new strategy for arresting open carriers. (The old strategy wasn't working because sometimes when a misguided LEO arrests someone here a lawsuit against the municipality is filed.)

I called Brian Jeffs, President of Michigan Open Carry, and gave him a heads up thinking that he might want to attend the meeting. He did attend and afterward sent me the following email:

“Boy did you get it wrong.  The talk wasn't about how to arrest OCers, just the opposite.  It was about how you can't arrest them without facing a law suit.”

Okay, so I got it wrong. Would you believe that was the first time? Actually, this was one instance where I was thrilled to be wrong. Five years ago I was rabidly anti-Open Carry, but I've done a full about face since then and now support it to the max.

Aside from being a basic human right, I believe it's a very important tool in the PR struggle to regain the hearts and minds of the public. There's nothing like a sunny picnic with kids playing on the swings, the smell of burgers on the grill, good talk with friends and family, and a gun strapped to every hip. Read more

Source: Grand Rapids Gun Rights Examiner

Jury Acquits Man in 2006 Shooting

0

Man acquitted of 2006 shooting as justifiable self-defenseThe Hall County Superior Court jury deliberated for less than an hour before acquitting Moz of the felony charge, which carried a sentencing range of one to 20 years.

The man Moz shot, 21-year-old Nathan Tony Monson, was released from a hospital just days after sustaining a bullet wound in front of his left ear. He survived the shooting with some hearing loss but no other permanent injuries, according to Brett Willis, the assistant circuit defender who successfully defended Moz.

Willis said his client fired the shot from a legally owned 9 mm handgun on the night of Oct. 1, 2006, after his client’s older brother was severely beaten by an unruly mob of at least six teenagers in front of California Records, a store next to the Kangaroo convenience store on Park Hill Drive.

The beating victim, Juan Moz, was injured by large chunks of asphalt hurled at him by “a group of ne’er-do-wells harassing a couple of guys who were just walking,” Willis said.

The Moz brothers were walking home from a baby shower they attended at the Glen Cove apartments when they were attacked, Willis said.

The prosecution sought to show Juan Moz was confronted after he made advances on a young girl at the apartment complex, but Moz denied that allegation.

While down on the ground, Juan Moz was kicked in the face by a teenage girl who was charged and later prosecuted in juvenile court, Willis said. Read more

Source: gainesvilletimes.com

Burglar V. Shotgun: Homeowner Wins

0

Investigators said the homeowner, Mark Brown, returned to his house in the 8500 block of Norton at about 9:30 a.m. when he heard someone inside.

Brown grabbed a shotgun hidden under a bed and found the burglar in a bedroom, police said.

The homeowner fired several shots after the burglar rushed at him from a closet. The burglar was hit three times, according to investigators.

The burglar, whose name was not released, died at the scene.Milton Brandt has lived on Norton for 50 years. He called 911 after the shooting.”I just talked to (Brown) a while ago.

He's upset, sure he is,” Brandt said. “He walked in the door and said all the lights are on.”Brown said he felt lucky that the burglar did not find the shotgun.”

The guy had already ransacked his bedroom and just so happened that God bless him, and he didn't find the shotgun under the bed,” said David Brown, the homeowner's father. Read more

Source: click2houston.com

Gun Digest the Magazine October 26, 2009

0

Gun Digest is the source for firearms news, pricing and guns for sale. Readers benefit from in-depth editorial expert advice, show reviews and practical how-to instructions. Subscriptions are the First Amendment way to stand up for your Second Amendment rights. Click here to begin your subscription to Gun Digest.

Inside This Issue:

• Editor Kevin Michalowski asks, “Are you ready for some hunting?” Click here to read his “Editor's Shot” column.

• Towsley on Target: Likeable Lasers

• Rifles: Hesse Arms and Heyn

• Shotguns: Harrington & Richardson

• Handguns: Wesson, Hopkins, Hy

• Performance Handloading: 7mm-08 is a great deer cartridge

• Tactical Gear: Barrett Semi-Auto 50 BMG

• Scholarships Awarded by NRA

• Gunsmithing: Herr Frankenpistole Lives

• The SIG 556 SWAT is the American version of the best damn 5.56×45 service rifle on the planet.

Click here to load up on a subscription.

Supreme Court Will Decide on Chicago Handgun Ban

0

“At issue is whether the right to keep and bear arms is a full-fledged constitutional privilege that can be invoked by individuals against the government at all levels, or a freedom that applies only as it concerns the federal government,” the Los Angeles Times noted.

“Last year, the justices in a 5-4 ruling said for the first time that the 2nd Amendment protected an individual's right to have a handgun at home for self-defense. Though that ruling struck down a handgun ban in the nation's capital—which is a federal enclave—it did not decide whether the right extended to states and cities,” the Times continued.

The justices have agreed to consider the case this fall term.

“This case will not be the end of all gun control, but it means politicians must be aware this is a fundamental right,” said Alan Gura, a Virginia lawyer who filed the suit on behalf of four citizens of Chicago.

 

Gun Owners: Alleged Tax Bill SB 2099 is a Hoax

0

There was a bill introduced into the Senate in 2000 that would have amended the Internal Revenue Code and therefore the National Firearms Act of 1934 to include handguns. The 1934 NFA is the legislation that created the mandate for tracking and taxing the manufacture and transfer of class III firearms and destructive devices. If made into law, handgun owners would fall under the same laws that owners of fully automatic weapons and firearms with silencers have to follow. It would have been the fear of national gun registration becoming a reality. Fortunately this legislation never had a prayer of passing nine years ago.

The original bill was S. 2099 (not SB-2099) and there are slightly different versions bouncing around the internet. In some versions the IRS would have a form that accompanied the 1040 or there would be a section of the 1040 that would require all gun information. A gun tax (usually $50 per gun) is mentioned. It is stated that either the senate does not have to vote on it or, it will be voted on while everyone is worried about health care and announced thirty days after passage. It may appear in a form that combines it with the very real and current H.R. 45; the Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009.

Most of these allegations are incorrect about the real legislation from nine years ago. IRS reporting on income tax forms was never involved. The tax was on the manufacturing or transfer of a gun not an annual tax. It amends the tax code of 1986 that is already in place for destructive devices (class-III weapons). Federal, state and local law enforcement would be involved but only to share registration information. These are the same rules that every owner of a class-III weapon has to follow now. Furthermore, it only involved handguns, not all guns.

The bill didn’t have a chance and everyone knew it, even the man that introduced it. Read more

Source: Baltimore Hunting & Fishing Examiner

Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Guns Exploits Crime to Push Agenda

0

It doesn’t appear to matter to people like Bloomberg and Nickels that various studies have concluded that criminals don’t get their guns from gun shows.

The rare exception and the one that seems to be repeatedly exploited was the case of Columbine High School killers Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris. Three of the four guns used in that crime were bought for them by Robyn Anderson at a gun show, who was not prosecuted, but did testify in favor of background checks at gun shows.

Now, full disclosure: I sit on the board of directors of the Washington Arms Collectors, which operates gun shows. The experience has provided an inside look at gun show operations.

Contrary to what Bloomberg and his bunch would have us believe, they are not “arms bazaars for criminals.” Gun shows, at least the ones operated by WAC, are pretty tightly regulated. I’ve seen members suspended for infractions of the rules. Following the Virginia Tech massacre, anti-gunners called for a closure of the so-called “gun show loophole,” knowing full well that killer Seung-Hui Cho did not obtain either of his handguns from a gun show.

The 51-page document suggests a handful of strategies that would tighten ATF oversight of thousands of gun shows held annually. Here in Washington State, in the wake of both the Capitol Hill massacre and the shooting at the Jewish Federation offices in downtown Seattle, calls went out to close the “gun show loophole.”

Authorities knew that neither Kyle Huff, the Capitol Hill killer who took his own life, nor accused Jewish Federation gunman Naveed Haq obtained their guns from gun shows. It’s as ridiculous as blaming George Bush for Chicago’s failure to snag the Olympic Games. Read more

Source: Seattle Gun Rights Examiner

Guns and the Law: How Many Gun Laws Have You Broken Today?

0

Maybe you drove to your favorite hunting spot, rifle in your trunk, and unwittingly passed within 1,000 feet of a school. Oops. You just violated the federal “Gun Free School Zones Act.” Maybe you just went leaf-peeping on the Blue Ridge Parkway, unknowingly bringing a gun into a national park.

One of the most laughable assertions made by gun control advocates is that guns are “unregulated.” In truth, with (by some estimates) as many as 30,000 gun laws on the books, navigating the minefield they create becomes nearly impossible.

But don’t worry, you aren’t alone. Quite often, cops don’t understand gun laws either. A few weeks ago, I got an e-mail from someone in Durham, NC who was accosted and threatened with arrest for simply walking down the street with a holstered handgun on his hip, never mind that absolutely nothing in North Carolina law prohibits him from so doing. Adding insult to injury, I have seen even a state Attorney General’s office willfully misinterpret the law.

As demonstrated below, some laws have unintended consequences which render them all but unenforceable … until an ambitious, anti-gun district attorney decides to prosecute. Read more

Source: Charlotte Gun Rights Examiner

Oregon to Re-Examine Campus Carry

0

At an informal hearing before the Senate’s Judiciary Committee Wednesday morning, Bend lawyer and former Sen. Neil Bryant, who served on the committee for eight years, requested the legislature form a working group to attempt to resolve the legal issues surrounding the bans.

The main case in question was filed by the Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation and petitions the court to determine the validity of the Oregon University System’s handgun ban, which affects those licensed to carry concealed handguns.

“It’s a basic question of whether or not educational institutions have the authority to regulate weapons on their campus,” Bryant said.

However, Bryant said oral arguments in the case will to be heard until early spring of 2010. In the meantime, he urged the Senate to “be proactive.”

During the question and answer portion of the hearing, Bryant repeated the OUS’ position that handguns are fundamentally unsafe in a campus environment.

“Let’s say you’ve got a concealed handgun,” Bryant said. “It’s there legally. You’ve got a permit. Your friends and you had a few beers and someone says, ‘Hey, you know, I’d like to see your .357 Magnum or whatever.’ And you take it out. You start handling it or using it. Hopefully it’s not loaded. Or you’ve broken up with your girlfriend, and you’re under extreme stress because of that, or maybe you’re really unhappy with the professor in a class. You know, just why have the availability of a handgun on campus?”

DPS Director Doug Tripp and other campus safety officers from around the state were on hand to answer questions, but no questions were directed at them.

Rep. Kim Thatcher, an outspoken supporter of allowing licensed concealed handguns on campus, tried to speak at one point, her policy director, Dawn Phillips, said. Phillips said committee chair Floyd Prozanski did not allow Thatcher to speak. Read more

Source: dailyemerald.com

Gun Digest Gun Rights Forum »

Izhmash: Russian AK Maker Bancrupt

0

Izhmash bancruptIzhmash is having little success in trying to force companies in Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Israel, China and the United States to pay licensing fees for the AK-47s they produce.

The typical defense is that it is a much improved rifle, with only a superficial similarity to the Izhmash AK-47. Some claim that Russia abandoned the AK-47 design in the 1970s, when they switched to the 5.45mm AK-74. Actually, the original AK-47 design was replaced in 1963, at least in Russia, by the similar (in appearance) AKM.

Izhmash is 201 years old, and was originally founded by the Czarist government as a state arsenal, for the production of military weapons.

During the Soviet period (1923-91), there were patent laws on the books, but these were generally not observed, especially when it came to foreign technology.

The Soviets would respect patents when it suited their purposes (that is, it was cheaper to get help from the patent holder to implement a technology, than it was to just steal it and figure it out), but generally the concept of intellectual property was ignored.

Having allowed that kind of thinking to gain some traction, the Russians have had a hard time enforcing rights to Soviet era Russian inventions in a post-Soviet world. Read more

Source: strategypage.com

Collectors: Values Could Rise

How will this affect the availability — and resulting collectible values — of genuine AKs, Dragunovs and Saiga shotguns? According to the firearmblog.com, “If you were thinking about buying a Saiga rifle or Saiga-12 shotgun. I suggest you buy it right now.”

Dan Shideler comments on Izhmash bancruptcy
Dan Shideler: Izhmash bancruptcy won't necessarily make their guns more collectible, but AK prices could rise.

According to Gun Digest's very own Dan Shideler, who edits the Standard Catalog of Firearms and Gun Digest 2010, values of Russian manufactured arms could rise, but there are other factors to consider.

“This is one of the risks run by companies that fail to police their actual or intellectual property rights zealously,” Shideler said. “A similar situation occurred here in the USA several years ago when Colt sued a company that was making a clone of the Single Action Army. Colt held that their “trade dress” rights — not an actual patent or trademark, which Colt did not hold on the SAA — had been violated since the other company's product so closely resembled theirs. The court didn't sustain Colt's opinion, which is good, since if it had, it would have stopped production of virtually all other single-action revolvers (Ruger, EMF, Uberti, USFA, etc.) unless these manufacturers paid Colt a licensing fee.

“As it turns out, the court's ruling did not substantially damage Colt, which had various other product lines and a great brand name to fall back on. Izmash is well-diversified, too, so they must be suffering from other serious internal problems as well.

“Would the bankruptcy of Izhmash make their guns more collectible? Probably not. Will it make prices for AK's rise? Possibly, if other manufacturers can't pick up the slack.”

Join the Marketplace section of the Forum

In light of the financial troubles and reported bancruptcy of Izhmash — the Russian manufacturer of AK-47s, Dragunovs SVDs and Saiga shotguns — will prices on these Russian firearms soon rise? Will this news compel you to consider buying arms made by Izhmash in anticipation of shortages? Click Here to Discuss the Collectibility of Izhmash Firearms in the Forum.

 

Supreme Court to Decide if State Gun Laws Violate Rights

0

US Supreme Court to hear Gun Rights Case from ChicagoThe Supreme Court set up a historic decision on gun control Wednesday, saying it will rule on whether restrictive state and local laws violate the Second Amendment right to gun ownership that it recognized last year.

The landmark 2008 decision to strike down the District of Columbia's ban on handgun possession was the first time the court had said the amendment grants an individual right to own a gun for self-defense. But the 5 to 4 opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond the federal government and federal enclaves such as Washington.

Most court observers say they think that the five justices who recognized the individual right will also find that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments, a move that could spark challenges of state and local laws governing gun registration, how and when the weapons can be carried, and storage requirements.

The court will hear a challenge of handgun laws in Chicago and the neighboring village of Oak Park, Ill. It was filed by Alexandria lawyer Alan Gura, who successfully argued the Heller case. He said the Chicago ban is “identical” to the one found unconstitutional in the District.

The announcement came as the court prepared for its new term, which will officially begin on Monday. Justices sifted through more than 2,000 petitions accumulated through the summer and selected 10 to hear.

Also on the list was an examination of an anti-terrorism statute, widely used by federal prosecutors, that bans material support to groups that the State Department designates as terrorist organizations. Read more

Source: washingtonpost.com

MUST READ ARTICLES