The U.S. Army has announced, “that soldiers may use only government-issued magazines with their M4 carbines, a move that effectively bans one of the most dependable and widely used commercial-made magazines on today's battlefield,” Military.com reported.
The Army's “safety of use” message didn't mention any specific make or model of magazines, though according to Military.com, the PMAG polymer M4 magazine, made by Magpul Industries, is the favorite non-Army magazine of the troops.
The PMAG's “rugged design has made it as one of the top performers in the small-arms accessory arena, according to combat veterans who credit the PMAG with drastically improving the reliability of the M4.”
The Army's safety of use message, “did not single out PMAGs, but instead authorizes only the use of Army-issued aluminum magazines. The message offers little explanation for the new policy except to state that ‘Units are only authorized to use the Army-authorized magazines listed in the technical manuals.' Nor does it say what Army units should now do with the millions of dollars' worth of PMAGs they've purchased over the years.”
Find Magazine Pouches
A variety of quality magazine pouches are available right now at GunDigestStore.com.
Click to browse magazine pouches.
Why You Can Trust Gun Digest
Since 1944, Gun Digest has been a trusted authority on firearms, shooting and shooting gear, delivering expert firearms reviews backed by nearly a century of experience. We go beyond standard reviews, combining hands-on independent gun testing, in-depth research, and expert insights from industry professionals and manufacturers.
Our reviewers are the bedrock of our testing and come from a comprehensive cross section of the shooting world. Their diverse backgrounds include law enforcement professionals, military veterans, competitive shooters, seasoned hunters and life-long firearms enthusiasts. In addition to being firearm experts, we are also thorough journalists adhering to the strictest standards of the profession.
For our readers, this means objective, unbiased reviews, free from outside influence. Our priority is to provide the information you need to make informed decisions—whether a firearm or piece of gear is a must-have investment or one to pass on.
Find out more about our Editorial Standards and Evaluation Process
Typical Army response…
Make a statement, not explain why the statement changed past policy, and no direction for the currently owned PMAGs!
Evidently there was a reason that the PMAG was the “Choice of the Experts”, and the edict does not answer those questions that still remain.