With the H1N1 “swine” flu season moving into full swing, and with AIDS/HIV and other deadly diseases continuing to plague millions of Americans, one might think that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), would have its hands full. After all, the CDC “serves as the national focus for developing and applying disease prevention and control, . . . to improve the health of the people of the United States.”
You might be inclined to think that with all that’s happening here and around the world posing very real and very serious health risks to the American citizenry, the CDC would have sense enough not to squander its resources on matters wholly unrelated to health and infectious diseases. If you made such a presumption, you’d be flat wrong.
The CDC, like many if not all federal bureaucracies, seems always to be searching for new projects and agendas in which to involve itself.
The CDC has tried this before. During the administration of former President Bill Clinton, the agency twisted the English language and impermissibly expanded its already broad jurisdiction over health and disease-related matters, in order to justify spending taxpayer money on the political agenda of gun control. The Congress thankfully slapped CDC’s hands and stopped it from this abuse of taxpayer money and agency jurisdiction.
Well, those loveable bureaucrats at CDC are at it again. Except this time, CDC is being even more clever — disingenuous is a more accurate term — in putting the square gun-control peg into the round disease-control hole.
The CDC says it is not funding research on ”guns” or “gun control.” Instead, a CDC spokesman says – whether with a straight face or not I don’t know, since the communication was delivered by e-mail in response to a Republican congressional inquiry – the agency is studying “the web of circumstances” (whatever that is) that surrounds gun violence. Thus, according to this nonsensical gobbledygook, it is proper in the CDC’s eyes for it to study how alcohol sales impact gun violence or the effects of injuries sustained by teenagers as a result of gun possession.
In other words, because some people who drink alcohol also might cause an injury or death to themselves or others by misusing firearms, and since alcoholism is a “disease,” it is appropriate for the CDC to study gun control. This subterfuge makes a mockery of the process whereby federal monies are appropriated in a way that reflects at least a colorable relationship with the agencies’ defined missions. Read more
Should Martha Stewart be prohibited from owning guns? Why?
On Wednesday, we talked about a person prohibited from owning guns. Yesterday, we looked at the legally-defined classifications of “prohibited persons”.
Many self-described “law and order conservatives” who support the prohibition, but who also profess to believe in the Second Amendment, would do well to realize that running afoul of a “gun law” can result in felon status, particularly in locales that prohibit bearing arms–even if a threat exists. Do they really want to be “judged by 12” for that, or are they just certain they will never have that decision forced upon them?
I have some questions for discussion:
If someone is enough of a danger to himself and others to be institutionalized, why would that person be released if they remain a danger?
As for “illegal immigrants,” why is it some of the same government actors who hate private ownership of firearms insist on fighting deportation of violent gang members?
It's been my long-standing contention that anyone who can't be trusted with a gun can't be trusted without a custodian. Simply put, if you have proven too dangerous to yourself and others to possess a gun, or box cutters, or fertilizer or matches, you're too dangerous to be allowed unrestricted access to the rest of us.
And if you're not dangerous, then what purpose does the gun prohibition serve? Read more
The lawsuit, filed by the Second Amendment Foundation, National Rifle Association, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Washington Arms Collectors and five individual citizens, was filed in King County Superior Court.
Washington’s preemption statute is solid and there is not a lot of wiggle room for misunderstanding its intent. The statute, RCW 9.41.290 reads, in part: “The state of Washington hereby fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge, and transportation of firearms, or any other element relating to firearms or parts thereof, including ammunition and reloader components. Cities, towns, and counties or other municipalities may enact only those laws and ordinances relating to firearms that are specifically authorized by state law…
”Nickels has said that a municipal-property owner such as Seattle may impose limits on firearms as a condition of entry or use of particular facilities, particularly those where children and other young people are likely to be. State Attorney General Rob McKenna, however, has disagreed, saying his office issued an opinion in 2008 which found that state law pre-empts local authority to adopt firearms regulations, unless specifically authorized by law. — Seattle Times
Stepping in to defend Nickels and the city in this confrontation at no charge is the Northwest office of an international law firm, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe.
This firm, according to its website, has 21 offices in Asia, Europe and North America. It has a history of providing pro bono legal representation to various causes. Plaintiffs are represented by Seattle attorney Steve Fogg with the Seattle law firm of Corr, Cronin, Michelson, Baumgardner & Preece LLC.
According to their website, the firm has been recognized for its litigation abilities. So how does this case have possible national implications? If Seattle’s creative approach as a private property owner simply regulating conduct on its park properties is allowed to stand (that strategy failed in Ohio, where a parks ban imposed by the City of Clyde was struck down by that state’s Supreme Court), it is conceivable that other cities in other states, or even in the Evergreen State, will start pushing the envelope.
I wrote about the Clyde case in this column. Judging from public comments in both the Seattle Times and the on-line Seattle Post-Intelligencer about this case, sentiment remains high against the out-going Nickels and his gun ban.
The legal issues will be hashed out in the courts. The city is arguing that its “most important public duty is to protect its citizens from harm, especially when they are visiting City facilities.” Here's a novel idea: How about simply leaving it possible for the citizens to protect themselves? Read more
According to an SCI press release, “Despite the best efforts of the state's Fish and Game Council, New Jersey's Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection has refused to approve a new comprehensive black bear management policy (Black Bear Policy) that includes hunting as a management strategy.
Under New Jersey law, without a policy in place, the State cannot hold a black bear hunt. The Commissioner's inaction has lead to a drastic increase in bear incidents state-wide since the last bear hunt in 2005.”
Said SCI President Larry Rudolph, “A well regulated hunt is essential for the sound and responsible management of black bear in New Jersey and for the safety of the general public. The goal of our lawsuit is simply to put legal pressure on the Commissioner and the Council to take the necessary action to adopt a Black Bear Policy.
Forcing action on a policy will allow the Council˜the people entrusted under New Jersey law to manage wildlife˜to decide whether a hunt is both the appropriate means of managing the state's bear population and a valued recreational experience.”
During a six-day season in December 2005, New Jersey hunters took 298 black bears.
Managing Deputy Attorney General Tom Smith said state officials just completed a written agreement with North Dakota to recognize West Virginia concealed weapons permits, and paperwork is in the mail to finalize an agreement with Delaware. “It should be back any day now,” Smith said Wednesday.
The new agreements will bring to 20 the number of states with which West Virginia has concealed weapons reciprocity. The reciprocity agreements mean those states recognize valid West Virginia concealed weapons permits, and West Virginia recognizes theirs.
Once the deal with Delaware is final, West Virginians with valid concealed weapons permits will be able to legally carry a hidden gun in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia under written agreements between West Virginia and those states.
Smith said Indiana, Montana and Vermont automatically recognize West Virginia concealed weapons permits without the need for a written reciprocity agreement, and Idaho and Kansas appear to recognize West Virginia's permits. “If you're going to Idaho or Kansas, call them to get a local answer,” he said. Read more
John Cole broke into an amputee's home and was met with hot lead from a .357 mag. He was later arrested.
FERNDALE, Mich. — Ferndale police said a 72-year-old man with an amputated leg shot at an intruder who was in his house early Thursday morning.
Police said the victim hear was woken up by noise inside his home at about 3:40 a.m.
The victim grabbed a .357 revolver and shot at the intruder when he came to his bedroom door, police said.Police said the victim missed the man, who he identified as a man from the neighborhood.
John Robert Cole, 56, was arrested at a nearby 7-Eleven store, and officers found the victim's wallet in his pocket.
Police said Cole has been arrested several times in the last year and convicted of various misdemeanors. Read more
Officer Timothy Brenton killing thought to be assassination.
Investigators on Sunday fielded tips, interviewed potential witnesses and scoured through video tapes for evidence that would lead them to the assailant or assailants. They have not yet identified a suspect or the suspect's vehicle, nor have they determined what kind of weapon was used.
Killed in the Saturday night shooting was field training officer Timothy Brenton, 39. Rookie officer Britt Sweeney, 33, suffered a minor injury.
The two were discussing a routine traffic stop while parked in downtown Seattle when their police cruiser was suddenly struck several times by gunfire shortly after 10 p.m., officials said.
Assistant Police Chief Jim Pugel said Brenton died instantly. Sweeney ducked, and a bullet grazed her back. She then called for help and returned fire, Pugel said.
“This is an assassination, and every resource is being used to bring it to a conclusion,” Pugel said.
Brenton became the city's first officer killed in the line of duty since 2006, and Saturday's shooting was the first intentional homicide of an officer since 1994, police officials said.
Pugel said there had been no threats against Brenton and no indication the assailants were looking for him.
Sweeney was taken to the hospital but was later released and is at home. She joined the force about six months ago, and had graduated from the academy just weeks ago.
Brenton is survived by his wife and two children, ages 11 and 8, officials said. His father and uncle are retired Seattle police officers.
“Everybody loved him,” the officer's uncle, Jon Brenton of Kingston, Wash., told The Seattle Times. “I don't think there was any reason anybody would come after him.”
Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels described the shooting as “cold-blooded.” Read more
Having lost its seacoast to Chile during the ill-fated War of the Pacific, 1879-1884, Bolivia, nursing its wounds in the Andes, set the stage for the Gran Chaco War of 1928 to 1935. The Gran Chaco originally belonged to the same Spanish Colonial District as Bolivia, so Bolivia assumed the Chaco was subject to the Spanish administration successor government.
Bolivians did not live in the Chaco and had virtually no connection with the Chaco or with the people who inhabited it. Paraguayans, mainly the Guarani, who were the indigenes of Paraguay, were nevertheless part of the Chaco by culture and language. Paraguay had claimed the territory when Spanish rule collapsed in 1810, its real claim resting upon the fact of use and occupation.
Over the years, Bolivian soldiers had gradually encroached upon Paraguayan territory in the Gran Chaco area of Paraguay. In the meantime, the country of Bolivia, with the aid of its huge tin revenues, had embarked upon a vast rearmament program.
On the lazy, very hot morning of December 5th, 1928, Bolivian Lt. Lozada, commander of the detachment at the fortin (fort) Vanguardia in the Chaco, was taking his ease in his quarters, waiting for the troopers under him to prepare the morning coffee. Suddenly, several of them saw what they thought was a flock of ostriches in the thick brush, but realized as they drew closer that they were mounted men. One came forward under a flag of truce. He was a Paraguayan trooper!
He gave Lt. Lozada a typewritten message which read: “The Paraguayans, knowing that you have occupied our territory, we allow you ten minutes to stack arms and be ready for us, one hundred meters south of the barracks. Otherwise we shall open fire.”
Paraguayan infantry was advancing from all sides, and Lt. Lozada passed out the single case of ammunition to his men, which amounted to a mere fifteen to twenty rounds per man. In ten minutes it was all over, with five Bolivians dead and two officers and nineteen men captured. These were indeed shots heard round the world! Long before the age of television, what happened in a few short minutes caused a little-known, minor league South American dispute to make international headlines around the world.
Outside collaboration and mediation led to a compromise solution of the incident without war….but only for the moment! The basic problems remained and flared into full war in 1932. Under the hand of Major, later General, Hans von Kundt, Chief of Staff, the Bolivian military establishment had been under the influence of a German Military Training Mission from 1911 forwards. The Bolivian army was organized along pre-WWI lines, but due to the poor quality of officers, proved to be generally inefficient.
Based upon loans collateralized by Bolivian tin exports, funds from US and Canadian banks were obtained to rearm the Bolivian army, with the contract going to the Vickers conglomerate.
VZ24 rifles and ZB26 Light Machine guns were subcontracted from Brno in Czechoslovakia, while Vickers equipped the Bolivians with machine guns and artillery. In Paraguay, armed conflict was the usual manner in which a change in government was effected, and by 1924 there were less than 4000 serviceable rifles available to the Paraguayan military.
Both countries could avail themselves of Model 1891 Argentine Pattern rifles in moderate supply (these are still available now and then on the collector’s network and, in excellent condition, can fetch from $250 to $300). Both countries early in the century had decided upon weapons based on the Mauser Model 98 action; the Bolivians chose the Model 1908 long rifle and short rifle.
The Paraguayans bought an unknown number of Mauser Model 1907 rifles and carbines. (These are rarely seen outside of Paraguay as the Paraguayans have not released their obsolete weapons from this period. If found in good to excellent condition, these weapons will fetch prices of $195 to $300). A number of Model 1903 Turkish pattern rifles may also have been purchased. The Paraguayans also purchased many Italian VV71s in 6.5mm, following the old maxim, “if it shoots, we can use it!”
After the war commenced in earnest, the Bolivian army inadvertently became the biggest supplier of arms to the Paraguayan army! At Campo Via, on 11 December 1933, the Bolivians lost 8,000 Mauser VZ24 rifles, 25 Stokes-Brandt mortars and approximately 500 machine guns to the Paraguayans, as well as Solothurn 15mm anti-tank rifles.
After firing the first shot, brace the butt of the shotgun on the ground. The hand comes up to the forend to cycle the empty shell out of the chamber.
While the handgun is an easy firearm with which to learn shooting skills, it is not the most powerful defensive weapon one may choose. The home defense shotgun lays claim to that title.
The handgun comes first to mind in discussion of defensive firearms because the pistol’s small dimensions provide the portability and concealability valued by the individual legally entitled to carry a concealed firearm for personal defense. Other defensive functions, including home defense or protection of a place of business, may be served as well or better by a light rifle or a shotgun.
As the second shot fires, the recoil has opened the action slightly on this old, well-worn Remington 870.
Shotguns have many great characteristics for the ensconced defender — that is, for one who must remain in position and fight instead of fleeing. The shotgun is a common home-defense and sporting firearm that not so many years ago also saw extensive use in police service. We benefit from the shotgun’s long history since it provides many, many variations from which to choose, lots of ammunition options, and can fine tune the shotgun’s fit with a wealth of accessories.
Terminology
With shotguns, the term “gauge” is similar to our use of “caliber” for handguns and rifles. Unlike caliber, with gauge the larger the number, the smaller the bore. Historically, gauge was defined by the number of solid balls the same diameter as the inside of the barrel that could be made from a pound of lead. Thus, the 10-gauge shotgun is larger than the 12-gauge, which is larger than the 20-gauge. Even smaller are the rather uncommon 24- and 28-gauges. The exception is the smallest of all, the .410 shotgun, which is expressed by the measurement (caliber) of its nominal bore size.
The most common shotgun gauge is the 12-gauge, the dominant shotgun choice in law enforcement. For home defense, the smaller 20-gauge shotgun does the job just fine, and this smaller shotgun is often found in use by smaller-statured birdhunters, as well.
The shotgun is unique in its ability to fire shells containing varying numbers of pellets, different sized shot, slugs, and in some guns even shells of several lengths for a magnum or standard charge. It is really quite a versatile defense tool that can be a lot of fun to train with.
The great advantage of the home-defense shotgun is its simultaneous delivery of multiple projectiles at reasonably high velocities. The effect of 20 .25-caliber pellets of #3 buckshot moving at around 1200 fps from a 20-gauge shotgun is vastly more devastating than firing nine single shots of .25 caliber handgun ammunition into an assailant.
When innocent life is threatened, the overwhelming concern must be to stop the attack quickly. At that instant, we are not worried about the eventual survival or demise of the assailant; seeking only an immediate cessation of the attack. Used to stop violent attack, the shotgun is effective indeed when fired with accuracy and skill.
Pros and Cons
The home-defense shotgun is best employed when the home’s occupants can take refuge in a prearranged, protected area, and defend themselves from a single point. The multiple projectiles that make the shotshell so effective are equally dangerous to innocents if they miss the intruder and penetrate walls of occupied rooms. Handgun ammunition poses the same danger, of course, but this hazard is compounded by the multiple projectiles each shotshell contains. Later, we’ll discuss shot patterns, how they spread over varying distances, and the penetration potential of various shotgun loads.
As a defensive weapon, the shotgun seems best suited to childless couples or single occupants, or in home layouts where those to be protected are sure to be clustered behind the defender. The shotgun works well if those responsible for home defense take their position at the head of a hall that precedes all other bedrooms, or can defend the family from the top of a staircase, if all the residents are ensconced on the upper floor.
In any home-defense plan, the downfall of the shotgun will be its weight and length. If you must hold a home intruder at gun point with the shotgun for more than 10 or 15 minutes, its weight will become tiresome indeed. 12-gauge shotguns weigh around 7 lbs.; 20-g. shotguns average 5 lbs. Compare that weight to your 1- to 2-lb. handgun when deciding which home-defense tool will work best for you.
Shotgun Myths
You may have read elsewhere that the shotgun can be fired accurately without taking time to align the sights. This is not true. At home-defense distances like five yards, it is entirely possible to completely miss a human-sized target if the sights are not used! Skill with the shotgun, like any other defensive firearm, requires competent instruction, dedicated practice, sighted fire and trigger control. When these skills are mastered, it becomes a devastating weapon.
Others have written that one big disadvantage of the shotgun is that it requires two hands to operate. This is not entirely true, either. Certainly, with only one hand, it is faster and easier to fire a pistol than a shotgun. Still, with advanced training, one can operate the shotgun with just one hand, including cycling a pump shotgun.
Shotgun Selection
(Top to Bottom) Youth sized Mossberg Model 500 20-gauge pump shotgun, bird hunter’s Winchester Model 1400 16-gauge autoloading shotgun and police-style Mossberg Model 590 12-gauge pump shotgun.
Just as handgun fit is crucial to accuracy, the shotgun must also fit the shooter. Women face a challenge in finding shotgun stocks that are sufficiently short. One great advantage to the 20-gauge shotgun is the ready availability of “youth models,” short-stocked shotguns that operate just like the full-sized models. Most full-sized shotguns have a 14″ or longer length of pull (the measurement from end of stock to trigger), while youth models usually go at 13 inches.
When the shotgun’s stock is too long, the shooter’s support arm is nearly hyperextended, instead of bent at the elbow for strength needed to hold up the shotgun and pull it in tightly into the shoulder. Without strong support from the non-shooting hand, the shooter leans back at the waist, attempting to balance the weight of the shotgun over her hips. If merely holding the gun was required, this would succeed; however, when firing the shotgun, a shoulders-back stance is disastrous.
When strong stance is compromised, the recoil’s effects are intensified. If the overlarge shotgun is a pump action, working the slide can pull the shotgun out onto the shoulder joint, where it must be repositioned before the next shot, or it will recoil painfully into the joint.
By now, you can see the necessity of proper stock fit. As a general rule, when the butt of the shotgun is held in the elbow crook of your bent arm, the first joint crease on your index finger should fully contact the trigger. The 20-gauge youth shotguns fit this dimension perfectly for many women and should be seriously considered when buying a home-defense shotgun.
If a youth model is too short, you can add a recoil pad like the Pachmayr Decelerator, which not only dampens the felt recoil enormously, but also adds length to the stock.
Alternatively, the entire stock can be replaced with one with a 13″ length of pull, like those sold by SPEEDFEED®2 or the rubber overmolded 12″ stock by Hogue.
Requiring no gunsmithing to install, replacement stocks screw onto the Remington pump or semi-auto shotguns with relative ease. A more expensive alternative is to buy a full-sized shotgun with a wood stock, then pay a gunsmith to cut the stock to size. I have done both, and swear by my short little Hogue stock.
Learn how to shoot back: Order the new Personal Defense for Women book. Click here to buy now.
Alabama — Mobile police say a possible burglar was shot and killed while he was trying to break into a home. Police say they received a call of a burglary in progress on Louise Drive around 6:45 Tuesday night.
Details are scarce, but police say the man was attempting to break into the home when he was shot in the chest by a female inside. Read more
“Everybody, at every level of law enforcement, federal, state and local has always known that the gun show loophole is a major source of guns getting into the hands of criminals.”
Really? Well, no. And yet Feinblatt was allowed to blather on unquestioned about his obvious lie, and unchallenged in any way about the rest of his allegations, for more than eleven minutes.
Because he started with such an obvious lie, truly nothing else he said deserves discussion. But a flub on the part of Feinblatt in an answer to one of Moulthrop's softball questions was also revealing.
After playing a short segment of audio from the undercover video, Moulthrop asked Feinblatt to “tell us a little bit about your own response to this video from our investigators.”
“When we told investigators…uh..when we heard the tapes we were surprised by how brazen the responses were.”
One would expect that, if Bloomberg's cronies had evidence of actual crimes being committed, that their response would have been and should have been to tell actual law enforcement investigators.
And yet the reason that Feinblatt stopped himself after saying “when we told investigators,” and the reason we know he is lying when he claims that “everybody, at every level of law enforcement” agrees with them, is because Bloomberg's cronies have apparently NOT told investigators anything.
Indeed, in preparation for his segment on the show, Irvine confirmed with the City of Sharonville, OH, where some of Bloomberg's minions went undercover, that Bloomberg had not turned over to them any evidence of any alleged crimes. Law-enforcement officials in other cities and states that received visits from Bloomberg's minions have been quoted as saying the same.
Another interesting claim uttered by Feinblatt amidst his false claims and twisted statistics was this:
“We think that most gun sellers obey the law. We think that gun shows are good events where people with like-minded interests come together and share their common enthusiasm for hunting.”
Gun shows are all about hunting? Really? Well, no. And if they truly believe that most gun sellers obey the law, then why won't they agree with gun rights proponents that the problem is one of enforcement, rather than something that demands new laws which will strip away the rights of what they agree are the majority of law-abiding sellers? Unfortunately, Moulthrop never asked. Read more
As you remember, the ObamaCare bill would dump your gun-related health data into a federal database. It would also put your (government mandated) insurance at risk if you keep a loaded gun for self-defense.
But there was a problem: The anti-gun health bills cost too much, and Obama had promised to pass a bill which would not raise the deficit by “one penny.”
So what Obama, Reid, and Pelosi did was to try to pass a separate bill (S. 1776) which would fund the anti-gun ObamaCare bill by raising the deficit another $247 billion dollars.
But, they would argue, because S. 1776 was a “separate bill,” the ObamaCare bill itself would not raise the deficit.
In a Senate not known for morality, this rose to a level of sleaze and corruption that embarrassed many Democrats, in addition to all Republicans.
With gun owners responding vigorously to our alerts on this issue, the motion to invoke “cloture” (or shut off debate) on the bill failed by a 47-53 vote — 13 votes short of the 60 votes the anti-gun socialists needed.
The victory on S. 1776 means that it will be much harder for Obama, Reid and Pelosi to pick up the somewhat fiscally-minded Blue Dog Democrats they so desperately need to get their anti-gun ObamaCare legislation passed.
So congratulations! It is true that this is only the first battle… but, if we continue battering Congress as we have, it will be the first of many victories.
Amtrak is raising serious objections to a proposal that would allow passengers to stow unloaded guns in their checked baggage, saying the train operator cannot screen passengers' bags the same way airlines do.
The Senate passed a measure last month that would allow passengers to declare and check a weapon on the trains, something airline passengers can do now, provided the weapon is unloaded and in a hard and locked case.
But Amtrak and some House members are against the idea. The House did not include the provision in their version of the bill approved by the Senate.
“That could jeopardize the operations of Amtrak because … we don't have the monies to invest in the protocol necessary to guarantee that these weapons won't be used against the traveling public,” said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.
Amtrak Police Chief John O'Connor said it's possible the system's random bag inspections could catch someone with an illegal weapon, but that Amtrak does not even have baggage cars on every train.
He said he does not want any weapons, checked or unchecked, on his trains.
But supporters see the measure as way to keep Second Amendment rights from being restricted. Read more
Police responded to a call of someone trying to break into a home in the 700 block of Oscar Smith Drive. Three residents were inside when a man forced his way into the home through a back door.
The suspect was armed with a BB gun resembling a real pistol. One of the residents fired numerous shots from a handgun, striking the intruder. The man fled on foot.
Shortly after the 9:50 p.m. incident, a man arrived at Central Texas Medical Center (CTMC) with several gunshot wounds. He received primary treatment at the CTMC Emergency Room and was transferred to the University Medical Center at Brackenridge in Austin. Read more
“Lawmakers previously barred local governments from passing ordinances that restrict firearms, and Schmidt wants to apply the same law to public universities and colleges.”
“The question is who ultimately determines where you can or cannot carry,” Schmidt said. “My view is the state legislature should be the ultimate authority on that … not local colleges.”
“State law currently bans the carrying of concealed weapons inside college classrooms, dormitories and sports arenas,” the Record-Eagle noted. “Schmidt said his bill wouldn't change that, but he won't rule out dropping those restrictions, either Schmidt, a member of the National Rifle Association, said his bill's primary goal is to make sure people with concealed carry permits don't have to worry about facing arrest as they cross into certain areas.”
“The main purpose of it is to clarify the law and put everyone on the same playing field … I just want to make sure responsible, law-abiding gun owners know what the law is throughout the state of Michigan, and that they don't get caught up in one difference here and one difference there,” Schmidt explained.
The botched home invasion robbery ended quickly when one of the suspects sustained a nonfatal gunshot wound to the stomach, according to the Charlotte County Sheriff’s Office.
Authorities have arrested one man, and intend to charge the other upon his release from a Fort Myers-area hospital in connection to the attempted robbery at the 21000 block of Beaverton Avenue.
The incident occurred around 10 p.m. as Peter L. Gilmore, 69, and his 25-year-old son, James S. McGlone sat inside their home.
The Sheriff’s Office said McGlone went to answer the front door when it was kicked open by two men wearing stockings over their faces.
The men, later identified as Keith Sowers, 32, of Punta Gorda, and Port Charlotte resident Joshua Eugene Becerril, 29, entered. Becerril reportedly held a large knife at Gilmore’s face and threatened to kill him.
McGlone, however, ran into his father’s bedroom, where Gilmore kept several guns.
Sowers, toting a tire iron, chased him.
Detectives say McGlone pointed a handgun at Sowers and told him to leave, a Sheriff’s Office report said.
Sowers allegedly hit McGlone over the head with the tire iron, at which point McGlone shot Sowers in the stomach.
Sowers reportedly hobbled out of the house with Becerril. Read more
Looking to go armed, but are stuck in the weeds as to what to arm yourself with? Here are 20 excellent concealed carry gun options that will keep you on the defensive.
With the H1N1 “swine” flu season moving into full swing, and with AIDS/HIV and other deadly diseases continuing to plague millions of Americans, one might think that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), would have its hands full. After all, the CDC “serves as the national focus for developing and applying disease prevention and control, . . . to improve the health of the people of the United States.”
